Clear and present danger test, says speech may be restricted if evidence exists that such expression would endanger the public.
<h3>What is a clear and present danger test?</h3>
The clear and present danger test stressed that
printed or spoken word may not be the subject of previous restraint.
Unless there is a danger created by that expression, this test was originated in Schenck v. the United States.
Learn more about clear and present danger test at;
brainly.com/question/24452126
Option C is correct. United States uses the adversarial system in its courts. The opposing attorneys have responsibility for controlling presentation of lawsuit. Attorneys may not lie but have no duty to volunteer facts that don't support their client's case.
An impartial individual or group of people, typically a judge or jury, who try to ascertain the truth and pass judgement in accordance with it, is presented with two advocates presenting their parties' case or position under the adversarial system, also known as the adversary system, in common law countries.
Because it leaves less room for the state to be prejudiced against the defendant, advocates of the adversarial system frequently claim that it is more equitable and less prone to misuse than the inquisitional approach.
To know more about Adversarial system:
brainly.com/question/5921518
#SPJ1
Answer:in my opinion some of the problems can be resolved by haing more markets be run by the country so that they can have proper insurance and so the taxtes help flow back into the country.
Explanation:if u have insurance what u lose u can at least get some back and the taxes help the countrys financial problems wich also help u.
The new abortion law states that only states have the rights to decide on the abortion laws that they have in their states.
<h3>What was the Roe V wade ruling?</h3>
This was the ruling that was formerly used to say that abortions was legal in the United States. This law was overturned recently. This gives the states the rights to decide if they would want to continue allowing abortions or not.
For the states that would rule it as illegal, it means that women would no longer have the rights to terminate the pregnancies that they do not want. The reason I would say abortion is important is because it may be useful in issues where the pregnancy is a high risk for the carrier.
Read more on Roe V Wade here: brainly.com/question/3870089
#SPJ1
