Answer:
The two correct answers are C and E.
Explanation:
A merit-based system is one in which a person is valued for their achievements or merits. This means that the things taken into consideration to hire a person are their experience, knowledge, skill set, and any other abilities that prove relevant to the job. The ideal candidate will be the person who is best prepared and, therefore, deserves the job the most.
Other factors such as family connections, friends, or affiliation to a particular political party are not taken into consideration in a merit-based system.
<span>They used images and allusions from many different cultures, past and present
Modernists artist had developed a certain level of appreciation to ethnic and cultures that exist from all period because they believe all of them contribute to the society that we see today. Because of this, they often use images and allusins from past and present.</span>
I'm gonna say yes? Hope this helped you out.
Answer:
Frankish
Ostrogothic
Anglo-Saxon
Explanation:
The fall of the Roman Empire rests upon the attacks of Germanic barbarian tribes. Germanic groups such as the Visigoths, Vandals, Ostrogoths, and Franks, took turns destroying the Western Roman Empire. The Germanic Tribes eventually divided Roman holding provinces areas to settle down and formed kingdoms. In 476 C.E., Odoacer became King of Italy and the first barbarian to rule. Various Germanic tribes migrated into other regions. Many Germanic tribes merged, including the Angles with the Saxons in England, Clovis established the Frankish kingdom with established Catholicism in western Europe and Theodoric, Ostrogoths king, established Ravenna as capital.
Answer:
The situation of the 60s - early 70s of the 18th century gives the impression that Britain deliberately provoked a colonial rebellion. The starting point of post-war tension growth was decree of 1763 on the Allegany-Cumberland line. It was followed in 1765 by a series of laws aimed at further economic strangulation of the colonies, in particular the Stamp Act, which introduced the five times taxation of all printed matter produced in the colonies and any legal documents drawn up on their territory.
The legislative initiatives of the mother country have become increasingly ominous. Thus, failure to comply with the Stamp Act threatened with the death penalty. De facto colonies were plunged into the atmosphere of medieval legal brutality.
In response, the Sons of Liverty extremist groups attacked British military and royal officials in the colonies. In parallel, a massive boycott of British goods began.
Such a decisive response caused confusion in London. In parliament, the voice of a few supporters of softening attitudes toward the colonies was finally heard. The internal struggle that took place in British political circles at that time was reflected by subsequent “zigzags” in their lawmaking. So, in 1766 the Stamp Act was canceled and the Sugar Act was softened, which retained the prohibition only on the import of rum into colonies. But in 1777, the Townshend Acts entered into force, introducing increased duties on imported tea, glass, paper, paints, and lead.
The Boston Massacre provoked a violent reaction. Riots spread to small towns and rural areas. The escalation of the conflict has a ‘sobering’ effect on the British Parliament. A gesture of reconciliation on its part was the abolition of the Townshend Acts, with one strange exception - the preservation of high duties on the import of tea. But such small concessions could no longer defuse the situation.
Explanation:
