To play baseball was her only thought.
The infinitive phrase (to play baseball) is the subject of the sentence. Therefore, it is used as a noun.
Generally speaking, when writing research it is stronger to use factual evidence rather than personal bias, due to the fact that you probably aren't the most reliable source.
The external conflict must be B because she misses her family, that's more of a direct. And it can't be D since that can also count as an external (directly). Now it's between C and A. Which one of these are talking about a personal mental problem? A since she keeps thinking about it.
Answer is A.
Internal Conflict: "mental struggle arising from opposing demands or impulses."
Answer:
"Even today, the need for work is a common reason people move to urban areas."
Explanation:
- I don't see the question, just the passage.
- If the question is: "Select a sentence from the body of this article that can be removed without affecting the author's explanation. Place the sentence in quotes and explain why it is an unnecessary detail.", then the answer would be "They needed ways to move around the city."
- Otherwise, it would be "Even today, the need for work is a common reason people move to urban areas."
Answer:
Whenever someone sees injustice happening around them , they should stand up.
It's not only about the teenagers , it is the duty of every human being who has even a glimmer of humanity in them to stand up for those in need , to stand up for help, to stand for injustice.
The fact that whether teenagers should stand up for injustice in the absence of a support is the question risen here.
Well I think they should.
Most people get scared to do so, mostly not because they are coward , but rather for the fact that " Why should I stand up for it when it doesn't bother others" .
It is one of the most inhumane thing one could tell to themselves.
I suggest them to stand up for justice but by not being aggressive but through nonviolence.