1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Korvikt [17]
3 years ago
12

On December​ 31, 2014​, Renda​'s common stock sold for per share. At that​ price, how much did investors say​ $1 of the​ company

's net income was​ worth?
Business
1 answer:
shepuryov [24]3 years ago
6 0

Question Completion:

On December​ 31, 2014​, Renda​'s common stock sold for $35 per share. At that​ price, how much did investors say​ $1 of the​ company's net income was​ worth? Earnings per share = $1.50

Answer:

Renda Company

The value of $1 of the company's net income by investors was:

$23.33

Explanation:

a) Data and Calculations:

Market price of Renda's common stock = $35 per share

Earnings per share = $1.50

This means that investors' value on $1 = $35/$1.50 = $23.33

b) Investors in Renda's common stock place a value of $23.33 for each $1 of the company's net income.  This is why they can afford to pay $35 per share in order to benefit from $1 of the company's earnings.  This calculation is based on the price-earnings ratio, which relates the company's share price to the earnings per share.

You might be interested in
an economy where more money is being collected than is being allocated or spent is known as what type of economic stance
nlexa [21]

It is known as Contractionary.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain how depth affects oxygen content in ocean water.
stira [4]

Explanation:

Ocean warming-driven deoxygenation: Warmer ocean water holds less oxygen and is more buoyant than cooler water. This leads to reduced mixing of oxygenated water near the surface with deeper waters, which naturally contain less oxygen. Warmer water also raises oxygen demand from living organisms.

<em>PLEASE</em><em> </em><em>THANK</em><em>,</em><em> </em><em>RATE</em><em> </em><em>AND</em><em> </em><em>FOLLOW</em><em> </em><em>ME</em><em>,</em><em> </em>

<em>AND</em><em> </em><em>PLEASE</em><em> </em><em>MARK</em><em> </em><em>ME</em><em> </em><em>AS</em><em> </em><em>"</em><em>BRAINLIEST</em><em>"</em><em>ANSWER</em><em> </em>

<em>HOPE</em><em> </em><em>IT</em><em> </em><em>HELPS</em><em> </em><em>YOU</em><em> </em>

5 0
3 years ago
Cragmont has beginning equity of $277,000, net income of $63,000, withdrawals of $25,000 and no additional investments by owners
MatroZZZ [7]
The ending equity is $315,000 This is just a matter of adding income and subtracting withdraws. So let's do it. "Cragmont has beginning equity of $277,000," x = $277000 "net income of $63,000" x = $277000 + $63000 = $340000 "withdrawals of $25,000" x = $340000 - $25000 = $315000
3 0
3 years ago
Recher Corporation uses part Q89 in one of its products. The company's Accounting Department reports the following costs of prod
DedPeter [7]

Answer:

Recher Corporation:

a) Financial impact of buying part Q89:

i) Relevant costs for In-house production of part Q89 are the avoidable costs:

Direct materials - $7.60

Direct labour - $4.20

Variable overhead - $8.30

Supervisor's salary $3.20

Avoidable general overhead - $0.81

Avoidable cost = $24.11 per unit

Total = $24.11 x 6,200 = $149,482

ii) Relevant cost of buying outside equals outside price minus additional segment savings = (6,200 x $27) - $15,600 = $151,800

When i) is compared with ii), it shows that it would cost more to buy outside ($151,800) than to produce the part in-house ($149,482).

b) The alternative the company should choose is to produce in-house.

Explanation:

a) The avoidable general overhead of $0.81 was obtained by dividing $5,000 of general overhead by 6,200 units, i.e. $5,000 / 6,200.

b) The depreciation for the special equipment is not included as it is not relevant.  It must be incurred no matter the option chosen.

c) The relevant cost of buying the part outside was reduced by $15,600 since this amount would be realized as additional margin with the choice.

d) |n making cost decisions, relevant and avoidable costs are considered.  Any cost that will be incurred notwithstanding the choice made is not relevant.  Such costs are unavoidable.  For example, the depreciation on the equipment.

5 0
3 years ago
What is the best advice for you to follow when writing a persuasive claim message?
svet-max [94.6K]
It must be debatable. Hope this helps
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Edelman Oil performs oil changes. The standard wage rate for oil change technicians is $ 17 per hour. By analyzing its past reco
    12·1 answer
  • What advice does Lisa Marie Ford have for people interested in a career in marketing or business? (Site 1)
    9·2 answers
  • When the fed sells bonds to financial institutions, new money moves directly:?
    8·1 answer
  • S.O.S &lt;&gt;
    6·1 answer
  • Clementine Company makes skateboards. They prepare master and flexible budgets and then perform variance analysis after the budg
    13·1 answer
  • Federal antitrust statutes are complex, but the basic goal is straightforward: to prevent a major industry from being so dominat
    14·1 answer
  • Intercontinental’s special order requires 1,300 kilograms of genatope, a solid chemical regularly used in the company’s products
    15·1 answer
  • Select all the words that are associated with Demand
    10·1 answer
  • One current answer to the historical struggle within management to balance the things of production and the humanity of producti
    12·1 answer
  • Find the EAR in each of the following cases (Use 365 days a year. Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answers as
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!