1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
SSSSS [86.1K]
3 years ago
6

it is very clear in john 1:18 it says no man has never seen god at any time in first John, Even Jesus own statement in 5 and 37.

Jesus says and the father himself which has sent me had born witness me and you have never heard his voice nor seen his face at any time and Jesus was standing right there among them so if had been god why did he say why would you never see god at any time
English
2 answers:
vlabodo [156]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

In John, Chapter 5 and 37, Jesus is speaking to some Jews, probably some Pharisees. They have criticized him for healing someone on the Sabbath. Looking at the rest of the context, you see that Jesus is well-aware that they do not believe in him, so they do not, and can not see God in Him. Over 20 centuries, things have not changed: some people do not want to believe.

Explanation: Later in John 14 when Jesus is speaking with his own disciples, he is explaining His relationship with the Father. Jesus tells Phillip, "Whoever has seen me has seen the Father."

If you dissect the Bible, you find many apparent contradictions. It takes faith to see the big picture and believe. It's a choice.

Leto [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Explanation:

First of all, 1:18. This depends on what Bible you look at. I think the King James version is just about as clear as they come. I take it to mean what KJV says. Here it is

"No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him.

If you are a trinitarian, (I am not) this version does not help you very much, but it is clear. It means that no man (emphasis on man -- meaning those of us that are born on earth and were not created) has Seen God at any time. Then Jesus goes on to say that he has been at God's living bosom and he (Jesus) has come to declare who God is. If you put any more meaning that that on it, you are torturing language.

Now the second one is much harder, mainly because your grammar gets in the way. Your question means that you believe that Jesus and God are part of the trinity. Jesus in 1:18 claims only to be God's representative.

The Bible I use is the Good News Translation. Here's what it says about 5:37

The Father who sent me testifies on my behalf. You have never heard his voice, and you have never seen his form.

You have to understand clearly who Jesus is talking to. He is speaking to people who do not feel God (they have little or no Holy Spirit in them) and they cannot feel or see or know of God's presence. He is also talking about Baptism and the role of John the Baptist. This quotation is immensely complicated and cannot be read in isolation.

The fact that you think this upholds the trinity (that they should be able to see God by looking at Christ) is a widely held belief. You are certainly not alone in your beliefs. But you must read enough to find out who Jesus is talking to and about what. This particular verse is not saying what you think it is.

You might be interested in
Identify six capitalization and punctuation rules that should be applied to this sentence.
kirill115 [55]

Answer:

Capitalize the first word of the sentence

Use italics for the title of the book

Capitalize ppls names and titles used with their names

Use a period

Capitalize the languages

Use a comma after the title

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Consider Tim O’Brien’s story "Ambush." What differences do you see between how O’Brien dealt with killing an enemy soldier in th
Firlakuza [10]
<span> "Ambush," O’Brien describes killing a man while serving in war. He had no intention of killing him—he reacted without thinking. O’Brien feels guilty about having killed another human being, even though his fellow soldier tries to soothe him with the logic that the man would have been killed eventually anyway. However, trying to justify having killed someone, O’Brien explains that his training as a soldier prompted him to act involuntarily when he lobbed the grenade upon spotting an enemy soldier. Twenty years later, long after the war has ended, O’Brien is unable to admit to his daughter, Kathleen, that he has killed another person. He feels guilt and denial about having killed a man, and experiences recurrent flashbacks and visions. Through his story, O’Brien conveys that a soldier is a changed person after he has witnessed such a war, and those who have not been in a war cannot begin to understand the emotional turmoil that soldiers go through.</span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which pair of adjectives gives a correct comparison?
SVETLANKA909090 [29]

Answer:

The answer is A.

Explanation:

Terribliest is not a word.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
"steer or sail around"?
spin [16.1K]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Circumnavigate means sail around so that is the correct answer

6 0
2 years ago
Describe the steps involved in synthesizing information from several texts.
pochemuha

Answer:

I know it's a late answer but here

synthesize new ideas constantly. Never read passively. Annotate, model, think, and synthesize while you read, even when you're reading what you conceive to be introductory stuff. That way, you will always aim towards understanding things at a resolution fine enough for you to be creative.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you know that 4 X 5 = 20, how can you use the commutative property to find 5 X 4?
    5·1 answer
  • Charles Darwin hypothesized that some individuals would be better equipped for survival than others, and that those that were le
    10·2 answers
  • 6. Is Dee wholly unsympathetic? Is the mother's victory over her altogether
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements might be the theme of a piece of literature
    10·2 answers
  • what is the answer to this Which details best support the central idea of the excerpt? Select three options. The Grimms wanted t
    13·2 answers
  • What make school significance in life
    15·1 answer
  • Now Zeus the lord of cloud roused in the north
    7·1 answer
  • Which sentence correctly sets off information that is "nice to know" but not necessary to the sentence's basic meaning?
    12·2 answers
  • The following question has two parts. First, answer part a. Then, answer part b.
    10·1 answer
  • 5. Evaluate Find a passage in which the author provides facts about the setting. How effectively does the author make this infor
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!