The way the artwork below exemplifies nonrepresentational (or non-objective) art is:
- it does not represent anything we could identify.
<h3>What is Art?</h3>
This refers to the form of expression which is used by a painter or artist to create an impression about the artistic impressions of whatever he wants.
With this in mind, we can see that from the given art above, we can see that because it is nonrepresentational and makes use of abstract features, we cannot identify anything which it represents.
Read more about non objective art here:
brainly.com/question/1407430
Answer:
we option 2 and option 4 are just stuped ideas and in my experiance option 1 would be your best bet but if that fails (wich it shouldn't) then do option 3
Explanation:
Answer:
In the church, women could hold positions of great responsibility as abbesses of convents. In some instances, such as monasteries that housed communities of men and women, the abbess had seniority over monks
Yeah let’s hope it goes down well. You have a good morning also.
Answer:
Post-Impressionists both extended Impressionism while rejecting its limitations: the artists continued using vivid colors, a thick application of paint and real-life subject matter, but were more inclined to emphasize geometric forms, distort forms for an expressive effect and use unnatural and seemingly random colors.
