I support Andrew Jackson's claim which states that the Indian Removal was done in the best interests of American Indians.
The indian removal of the United States to Individual States brough several benefits, such as:
- It put an end to a possible <u>danger of collision.</u>
- It <u>allowed states to grow</u> rapidly in wealth, power and population, which reinforced the southwestern border.
In addition, the indian removal to the native americans contributed to:
- <u>Release the Indians</u> of the power of the state.
- Enabled them to <u>maintain their way of life</u> (culture, traditions, language, etc).
As Jackson quoted himself "The removal was necessary because the <u>Native Americans would be annihilated</u>".
A Trade to others because it is awesome
Railroads not only led to an increase in the ability to transport raw materials, but they also led to an "<span>B. increase in the demand for raw materials," since it provided for far more opportunities to use such materials all over the country. </span>
Answer:
Northern and Eastern Migrations: people from the upper Nile area and southwest Asia. These people became traders, and established the D'mt Kingdom.
Bantu Migrations: Bantu-speaking peoples left their homeland in the Niger River valley. Bantu's were farmers and they spread south and east.
Explanation:
The Corpis juris (or luris) civilid is the modern name for a collection of fundamental works in jurisprudence, Issued from 529 to 534 by order of justinian I, Eastern roman emperor