B is the answer....Hope i helped! :)
Btw, i suggest watching Cleopatra with Elizabeth Taylor... It can help you understand your homework better!
Answer:
False Alternatives
Explanation:
Giving half your money to charity is either morally obligatory or morally prohibited. But giving half your money to charity is not morally prohibited. In fact, it would be highly praiseworthy. Therefore, giving half your money to charity is morally obligatory. - The previous argument provides an example of False Alternatives
During the election of 1824, Andrew Jackson lost to John Quincy Adams. No one got the majority needed to be president, so the decision got sent to the House. Jackson had more votes (99) than Adams (84), but Adams ended up winning due to some "corrupt bargain" with Henry Clay, who influenced the House to vote Adams instead of Jackson.
Laissez-faire leadership, also known as delegative leadership, is a type of leadership style in which leaders are hands-off and allow group members to make the decisions.
This style should be used when
1. When team members have the skills to succeed. Laissez-faire leadership can be effective in situations where group members are highly skilled, motivated, and capable of working on their own. Since these group members are experts and have the knowledge and skills to work independently, they are capable of accomplishing tasks with very little guidance.
2. When group members are experts. The delegative style can be particularly effective in situations where group members are actually more knowledgeable than the group's leader. Because team members are the experts in a particular area, the laissez-faire style allows them to demonstrate their deep knowledge and skill surrounding that particular subject.
3. When independence is valued. This autonomy can be freeing to some group members and help them feel more satisfied with their work. The laissez-faire style can be used in situations where followers have a high-level of passion and intrinsic motivation for their work.
