1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kkurt [141]
3 years ago
10

How can i tell the difference between a direct object and an indirect object​

English
2 answers:
Flauer [41]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

The main difference between direct and indirect object is, direct object is the recipient of the action while indirect object is the recipient of the direct object.  

Explanation:

FYI i looked this up in my dictionary

Zepler [3.9K]3 years ago
6 0

Direct objects are the nouns or pronouns <u>receiving </u>the action, while the indirect objects are the nouns or pronouns <u>affected by</u> the action.

You might be interested in
What aspect of Kafka's The Metamorphosis can readers most relate to
Naddika [18.5K]

Answer: C

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
What does the prefix in Antagonist mean? A. Against. B. Reason C.without
Makovka662 [10]

A. Against. Anit means against

hopes this helps you

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What figurative language is "sake of skin"
amid [387]

Answer:metaphor

Explanation:

The figurative language is a metaphor

8 0
4 years ago
How is a participle formed?
liraira [26]

Each verb in English has two participles, they are present participle and a past participle. You use the present participle in the present progressive tenses, which indicate that an action is ongoing or continuous. For regular verbs, the present participle uses the ing form of a verb

The past participle helps form the present perfect tense because this tense spans both the past and present. Regular past participles are formed by adding ed to the verb.

<span>
</span>
7 0
3 years ago
You shouldn't trust his argument because he is a dishonest, deceitful scoundrel! Which best identifies the logical fallacy that
77julia77 [94]

The answer is A: name calling

 When someone tries to persuade others against somebody else by using words that insult the person and not their reason, it is a type of logical fallacy called <em>Ad Hominem (name calling)</em>. <em>It is when one person rejects or criticizes another person's views based on their personal characteristics or things that are not relevant to the argument discussed.</em>

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Interview with Marielle Tsukamoto is an example of __________. a primary source a secondary source an unreliable source an outda
    9·1 answer
  • The blood moon hung heavily in the sky, a rare ruby bestowed upon Mother Earth every few orbits of the sun. What is the analogy
    9·2 answers
  • “The future belongs to those who prepare for it today.”
    6·1 answer
  • Government by consent is really government by consensus—majority agreement in matters of opinions. What are the cues to the cont
    13·1 answer
  • In chapter 4, Huck decides to give Judge Thatcher all of his money. Why does he do this?
    9·2 answers
  • What american ally helped the patriots win the war
    6·2 answers
  • Read the passage.
    11·2 answers
  • Can someone plz help me on this...
    15·1 answer
  • Which sentence includes a descriptive adjective in a prepositional phrase? a( A green bottle with a piece of paper in it floated
    10·1 answer
  • 50 points!!!
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!