ANSWER : TRUE
EXPLANATION :
GDP denotes the total (gross)value of goods & services produced by an economy, during a period of time (financial year) .
This total value of goods can be calculated by both Income & Spending approach , based on assumption that 'one person expenditure is other person income'. Because both reflect the total value of goods produced .
This is evident from two methods to calculate GDP :
1. Expenditure Method
NDP (net value) = Compensation of Employees + Opereating Surplus + Mixed Income ;
Where - 1st COE is income of labour , 2nd OS (Rent + Interest + Profit) income of other factors - land , 3rd MI income from self employed .
2. GDP = Private Final Consumption Expenditure + Govt. Final Consumption Expenditure + Gross Domestic Capital Formation + Net Exports ;
Where - 1st PFCE is expenditure by private households , 2nd GFCE expenditure by govt , 3rd GDCF investment expenditure by firms , 4th expenditure by Abroad .
Sanders Inc. claims that it only uses organic cleaning products in its janitorial services. In reality, the company buys whatever is cheapest in bulk. This is an example of greenwashing.
Greenwashing is the system of conveying a false impression or supplying deceptive facts approximately how an agency's products are more environmentally sound. Greenwashing is taken into consideration by an unsubstantiated claim to lie to purchasers into believing that a agency's merchandise is environmentally friendly.
Greenwashing additionally called "green sheen", is a form of advertising and marketing spin wherein green PR and green advertising is deceptively used to influence the general public that an agency's merchandise, ambitions, and rules are environmentally friendly.
A traditional instance of greenwashing is when Volkswagen admitted to dishonest emissions tests by becoming diverse cars with a “defect” tool, with a software program that might discover whilst it changed into undergoing an emissions test and altering the overall performance to reduce the emissions degree.
Learn more about greenwashing here brainly.com/question/21992794
#SPJ4
Answer:
The Federal Reserve has been at times biased in favor of the financial industry, because they have often put inflation targeting above the need to reduce unemployment when executing monetary policy. Besides, the financial industry has often been rescued by massive loans from the Fed.
However, the Federal Reserve has also acted in favor of reducing unemployment, specially during recessions, by expanding the money supply through a policy known as quantitative easing.
In conclusion, we can say that the Fed tends to be biased in favor of the financial industry, but not at all times.
All economic questions and problems arise from <span>C. scarcity. scarcity is defined as the lack of resources and is the opposite of abundance. If scarcity such as famine is experienced by a country or nation, there arise questions why such state happened</span>
Answer:
No, as the net present value comes in negative
Explanation:
As we know that
Net present value = Present value of cash inflows - Initial investment
where,
Present value os $163,000
And, the initial investment is $180,000
Now placing these values to the above formula
So, the net present value is
= $163,000 - $180,000
= -$17,000
Therefore the company should not accept the project as net present value is in negative that is -$17,000
