Answer:
The man will be responsible for driving over a child of course. For he wasn’t supposed to drive and it was his responsibility to take care of himself before driving. And even if it was his first year he would still be accused as a criminal for when driving, everybody expects you to take your time to drive and be aware.
Explanation: Please correct me if I’m wrong.
The correct option is (c); Yes, because the court took all well-pleaded facts in the complaint as true and resolved all doubts and inferences in the defendant's favor.
<h3>What is third-part defendant?</h3>
A third-party defendant is a person or entity that the primary defendant sues and adds to the case under the theory that they are accountable to the defendant for all or part of the plaintiff's claim.
For the given case:
- The court must accept as true all of the well-pleaded facts in the complaint and resolve any questions and inferences in the complainant's favor before deciding whether to grant a motion to dismiss for failure to establish a claim on which relief can be granted. The complainant in this case is the defendant.
- Answer option A is erroneous because the third-party defendant's move was a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief can be given, not a petition to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Furthermore, not withstanding the lack of diversity of citizenship, the court has subject-matter jurisdiction over the defendant's contribution complaint since it is based on federal law, even though it may raise the question of lack of subject-matter jurisdiction on its own.
- B is the incorrect response option. The court may only take into account the claims in the complaint, any exhibits attached to the complaint, and any matters susceptible to judicial notice when deciding whether to grant a motion to dismiss for failure to establish a claim on which relief can be granted. (Remember that for a request for summary judgment, the court could take into account outside information like an affidavit.)
- Because any party against whom a claim is made may file a motion to dismiss for failure to articulate a claim upon which relief can be given, answer choice D is wrong.
To know more about jurisdiction and its types, here
brainly.com/question/10377896
#SPJ4
HACCP education and high turnover of employees and on farm it may increase the sanitation and safety levels of domestic lifestock products cannot be considered a benefit of implementing HACCP.
Explanation:
HACCP is Hazard Analysis Critical control point curriculum are the primary manual used for training the fish and fishery products, hazards and control guide published by the FDA.
The disadvantages of implementing HACCP are increased production and supervisory cost, and availability of staff time is less for other tasks, cost of implementation and reduced flexibility in production process and introduction of new process. The lack of understanding about HACCP, lack of time, staff turn over, employee motivation and lack of personal training are the main barriers of implementation.
Answer:46 questions
Explanation: The number of questions in the written part of the California driving test is different depending on how old you are. Under 18: 46 questions, 38 correct answers to pass. Over 18: 36 questions, 30 correct answers to pass.
