I enjoy arguementative essays because I believe that I can voice my opinion without any oppressors. It is hard to put my argument on paper, but after a lot of time and effort, I am able to easily make outlines for these essays which is a useful skill. I have the most trouble with the rebuttal because it is hard to write something that contradicts my opinion.
This is a brief outline, you can add more to it if you’d like.
Hope it helps!
Answer:
<u>Step 1: Determine which options are correct
</u>
<em>Which scenarios are considered ethically acceptable for journalists? Select three options/
</em>
- Option A: paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article
- Option C: ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community
- Option D: interviewing the CEOs of two insurance companies that are competing against each other
Option B doesn't make sense because if you are getting paid by a politician, that can further produce bias which can then lead to false things being spoke/written. Option E doesn't make sense because if you use information from a wiki page, that source is not verified which means that the source is unreliable. Therefore, the correct options are A, C, and D.
<u>Look at attachment</u>
I believe the correct answer is: D. The author humanizes the
prion with playful language by saying "[i]f it manages to burrow into a
corner."
In this excerpt from "Mad Cow, Furious Farmer”, the example
in which the author keepings a lively tone even while discussing a disease is:
"[i]f it manages to burrow into a corner."
As opposed to the terminology author uses (such as: bovine
spongiform encephalopathy (BSE)), the informal language of more commonly
understandable comparison gives the lively tone to this excerpt, even though he
is addressing the serious disease. Other example of this would be: "a
little bit squishy and maybe a little bit sticky".