I'm pretty sure its B. the US believed Bin Laden was responsible for 9/11 but the Afghan government wouldn't hand him over to the US.
<h3>
Answer:</h3>
The Proclamation of 1763 was a declaration made by the British government about American settlement.
What Did The Proclamation of 1763 Do?
The Proclamation stated that Americans could not settle any land to the west of the Appalachian mountains. The British government made the "proclamation line" which was a line that ran through Appalachia that showed the limit of American settlement. However, it is important to note that land west of the Appalachian had already been settled by many Americans, who believed they deserved that land. Additionally, the British government had almost no way to enforce this law.
Causes and Effects
The main cause of the proclamation was the French and Indian War. The war was very expensive for Britain, so they wanted to avoid possible future conflict.
But, during this time period, Americans had been used to a level of independence. Prior to this declaration, Britain had little interference in American politics or settlement. So, the sudden increase in government interference led to American resentment of the British. Also, the proclamation line was almost completely ignored by all Americans, which angered the British. The most direct effect of Americans ignoring the proclamation was that Britain sent troops to America to enforce British law.
The American resentment of the British people and government would eventually lead to Americans wanting independence. The Proclamation of 1763 and the Americans' reactions were one of the earliest signs of the Revolutionary War.
Women gained the right to vote with the 19th amendment opening up an array of opportunities for them.
Answer: (I've copy and pasted my old work of the independence)
All men are made equivalent and there are sure unalienable rights that legislatures ought to never disregard. These rights incorporate the privilege to life, freedom and the quest for satisfaction. At the point when an administration neglects to ensure those rights, it isn't just the right, yet additionally the obligation of individuals to oust that administration. In its place, individuals ought to set up an administration that is intended to secure those rights. Governments are once in a while toppled, and ought not be ousted for paltry reasons. For this situation, a long history of misuses has driven the pilgrims to oust an oppressive government.
The King of Great Britain, George III, is liable of 27 explicit maltreatments. The King meddled with the homesteaders' entitlement to self-government and for a reasonable legal framework. Acting with Parliament, the King additionally established enactment that influenced the states without their assent. This enactment required charges on the pioneers. It likewise expected them to quarter British troopers, taken out their entitlement to preliminary by jury, and kept them from exchanging openly. Moreover, the King and Parliament are liable of through and through demolition of American life and property by their refusal to secure the settlements' fringes, their seizure of American boats adrift, and their aim to enlist unfamiliar hired soldiers to battle against the pioneers.
-good enough??
