Answer:
The partition of the Ottoman Empire (Armistice of Mudros, 30 October 1918 – Abolition of the Ottoman Sultanate, 1 November 1922) was a political event that occurred after World War I and the occupation of Constantinople by British, French and Italian troops in November 1918. The partitioning was planned in several agreements made by the Allied Powers early in the course of World War I,[1] notably the Sykes-Picot Agreement. As world war loomed, the Ottoman Empire sought protection but was rejected by Britain, France, and Russia, and finally formed the Ottoman–German Alliance.[2] The huge conglomeration of territories and peoples that formerly comprised the Ottoman Empire was divided into several new states.[3] The Ottoman Empire had been the leading Islamic state in geopolitical, cultural and ideological terms. The partitioning of the Ottoman Empire after the war led to the rise in the Middle East of Western powers such as Britain and France and brought the creation of the modern Arab world and the Republic of Turkey. Resistance to the influence of these powers came from the Turkish national movement but did not become widespread in the post-Ottoman states until after World War II.
Explanation:
The answer is Emperor Hulagu. He sent wanted the Caliph (Al-Musta'sim) to demanded him to surrender the Capital. He promised to continue a governance and security to the land. However, Caliph (Al-Musta'sim), did not agree to Hulagu's terms and demands. T<span>he Caliph (Al Musta'sim) refused despite the weak military condition of his territory. Hulago made an embargo on Baghdad and soon entered the city and killed Abbasi caliph (Al-Musta'sim ).</span>
Massive retaliation means the US would respond to an attack with a larger response to annihilate the enemy.
Massive retaliation required a bigger, stronger weapon than held by an enemy. This policy forced an intense arms race which required the US to win in order to execute the plan. The use spent millions developing nuclear weapons and eventually the space program to prove they were prepared for an attack by the USSR.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Based on the answer provided, the only answer is A. For B, the Nazis would never free Jews so it can't be right. For C, there are still survivors of Jews so it can't be right. And for D, the 1st half is true, but they never forced the Germans to Israel, so that answer can't be correct.
The best option from the list would be "<span>restrictions on colonial trade", although the much larger issue was that the colonies did not have representation in Parliament. </span>
