<em>In the Divine comedy by Dante Alighieri the Canto IV is about the Limbo. One of the theological problems is related to baptism, Christian would say that baptism was necessary to salvation but the ones that were born before Christ and did not have a chance to be baptized were a problem. So here Dante addresses this issues by placing all people even the sinless in the Limbo because of their lack of baptism and for not worshiping God’s Trinity fully.</em>
<em>The second theological problem is about virtuous people, others scholars addressed that the virtuous people but not Christian would go to Heaven. Dante instead addresses this by placing these souls in the Limbo too, but they have their place of honour recognized and they have some privileges in the limbo “The signature of honour they left on earth is recognized in Heaven and wins them ease in Hell out of God’s favour”, so they don't suffer the same as the others that are sinful.</em>
I LIKE IT! ITS GREAT NO CHANGES NEEDED
Answer:
True
Explanation:
That's the definition of Confirmation bias, almost verbatim.
It’s not *supposed* to happen, but of course you can find instances where it does.
Some judges like to hand out longer sentences. Some are<span> just corrupt</span>.
It’s also possible that having the victim survive can work against you as they can now testify against you. An emotional plea from a victim can get a judge pretty worked up.
I don’t remember where I heard it, but a lawyer once advised a client that, “If you run someone over, be sure to back over them again and finish the job. Their family will get less money for a corpse than for a disability.”
