Answer:
B. lacking parallelism
Explanation:
The original sentence contains a predicate nominative (<em>singer</em>) and an action verb (<em>plays</em>), which shows lack of parallelism.
The best way to fix the error would be to use a parallel structure, which is the repetition of a certain grammatical form within a sentence:
"Shelia E. <em>sings </em>and<em> plays</em> the drums."
Now the sentence uses two action verbs <em>sings </em>and<em> plays</em> in the present tense, and this is an example of parallelism.
Answer:
Early in the morning,Mr Johnson and Andrew woke up and saw that their compound is untidy because the dry leaves has fallen on to their compound so they needed to tidy the place
Answer:
law Enforcement Services pathway
Explanation:
took the test
Answer:
Public school students do not lose their constitutional rights when they walk through the schoolhouse doors. The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized that “students in school as well as out of school are ‘persons’ under our Constitution.” This means that they possess First Amendment rights to express themselves in a variety of ways. They can write articles for the school newspaper, join clubs, distribute literature, and petition school officials.
But public school students do not possess unlimited First Amendment rights. Two legal principles limit their rights. First, as the Supreme Court has said, minors do not possess the same level of constitutional rights as adults. Second, the government generally has greater power to dictate policy when it acts in certain capacities, such as educator, employer or jailer. For instance, a school principal can restrict a student from cursing a teacher in class or in the hallway. However, the principal would have limited, if any, authority to punish a student for criticizing a school official off-campus.
Explanation:
I hope this helps
