The answer is D. Tremendous
<span>Ebert argues that death takes away everything you ever were on this earth. Everything you love or you want would go with death. So the value of death is that it reminds you how vital to find happiness, in any way that can be achieved.</span>
It's B
Retains her loyalty to nature as her affection for the hunter grows
<span>As you can see, this story is an example of man vs. nature conflict, that's why the state and condition of nature is that important regarding to the character's' mood and behaviour. The textual evidence from “The Interlopers” which supports the conclusion that nature reflects the mood of the characters is a.)"Assuredly there was a disturbing element in the forest, and Ulrich could guess the quarter from whence it came." The nature in this sentence explains character's actions.<span>
</span></span>
Answer: Dr. Naismith would have been surprised, if he had known how popular basketball would become.
Explanation:
The best way to combine these two sentences is to put a comma between them.
When joined together, these two sentences form a third conditional sentence.
In a third conditional sentence, one part of the sentence contains 'would have' + past participle <em>(would have been surprised)</em>, while the other part of the sentence contains 'if' and past perfect form of the verb (<em>if he had known</em>). Third conditional sentences are used to talk about impossible outcomes. Dr. Naismith was a physical educator who died in 1939. Therefore, the scenario of him witnessing the popularity of basketball is not possible.
