the answer you are looking for is activist.
Answer: Insufficient external justification; more dissonance
Explanation:
insufficient justification effect:
Describes that in some cases people will go against their own person belief in order to partake in a particular action of behaviour because there is a promise of a small reward versus large reward but reject an activity if it associated with a mild threat versus a sever threat.
Insufficient external justification occurs when a person doesn't have enough justification why they couldn't do something they desired to do.
Cognitive dissonance defines the conflict that exist within someone as they struggle with whether to get involved with the behaviour that goes against their beliefs or attitudes and they may mentally try to adjust their attitudes, behaviour or beliefs in order to establish balance.
Answer:
A time in ones life where they are a child. Some people would refer to it as, a childhood. Ages being from a child to a young adult.
Answer:
An appeal is a request for a higher court to review a lower court's decision.
Explanation:
In law, an appeal is the process in which cases are reviewed by a higher authority, where parties request a formal change to an official decision. Appeals function both as a process for error correction as well as a process of clarifying and interpreting law.[1] Although appellate courts have existed for thousands of years, common law countries did not incorporate an affirmative right to appeal into their jurisprudence until the 19th century
Answer:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Explanation:
