Article Five of the United States Constitution
describes the process whereby the Constitution, the nation's frame of
government, may be altered. Altering the Constitution consists of
proposing an amendment or amendments and subsequent ratification.
Amendments may be proposed either by the Congress with a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate or by a convention of states called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures.To become part of the Constitution, an amendment must be ratified by
either—as determined by Congress—the legislatures of three-fourths of
the states or State ratifying conventions in three-fourths of the states.[2] The vote of each state (to either ratify or reject a proposed amendment) carries equal weight, regardless of a state’s population or length of time in the Union.
Additionally, Article V temporarily shielded certain clauses in Article I from being amended. The first clause in Section 9, which prevented Congress from passing any law that would restrict the importation of slaves prior to 1808, and the fourth clause in that same section, a declaration that direct taxes
must be apportioned according to state populations, were explicitly
shielded from Constitutional amendment prior to 1808. It also shields
the first clause of Article I, Section 3, which provides for equal representation of the states in the United States Senate, from being amended, though not absolutely.
Answer: D) You want to remember the information.
Explanation: When you paraphrase you're not trying to rememer the information, you're putting the information in your own words.
I could be wrong, but I help this helps!
Personally, the option I would choose is D. exonerated: out of, to complete the analogy. My reasoning would be that when you are carried by emotions, you are elated, the same way that when you are exonerated, you are deposed, or out of a certain service.
However, the answer that I found people saying is correct all over the Internet is C. coherent : to place, so, I don't know whom you should believe, sorry. :/
Answer:
1. It can be inferred that Mama and Big Walter were not actually married when they moved in together.
Here is an excerpt:
MAMA: ... “Rat trap”—yes, that’s all it is.
(Smiling) I remember just as well the day me and Big
Walter moved in here. Hadn’t been married but two
weeks and wasn’t planning on living here no more than a
year.
2. Mama and Big Walter were depressed because of the incident that occurred when Mama lost her child, Claude.
Below is an excerpt:
MAMA: ...And then, Lord, when I lost that baby—little Claude—I almost thought I was going to lose Big Walter
too. Oh, that man grieved hisself! He was one man to
love his children.
3. The only thing that may warrant Beneatha not seeing eye-to-eye with Mama or Ruth is on the issue of God. Beneatha doesn't in the existence of a GOD and that belief infuriates Mama so much. Mama had to slap Beneatha when she made a statement against God.
(The question should be checked again)
Explanation:
"A Raisin In The Sun" is a play written by Lorraine Hansberry. The story is about an African-American family that lived in South Chicago who tried to improve their financial situation with an insurance payment after the demise of their father, Big Walter.
