Answer:
Permitted to live in settlements
Explanation:
He was among those deported to Babylonia, where he was located at Tel-abib on the Kebar canal.
Answer: Their journey became known as<u> the "Trail of Tears."</u>
Explanation/context:
In the court case, <em>Worcester v. Georgia</em> (1832), Samuel Worcester was a Christian minister working among the Cherokee and was supportive of the Cherokee cause. To block the activity of a man like Rev. Worcester, the state of Georgia passed a law prohibiting white persons to live within the Cherokee Nation territory without permission from the Georgia state government. Worcester and other missionaries challenged this law, and the case rose to the level of a Supreme Court decision. The decision by the Supreme Court, written by Chief Justice Marshall, struck down the Georgia law and reprimanded Georgia for interfering in the affairs of the Cherokee Nation. Marshall wrote that Indian nations are "distinct, independent political communities retaining their original natural rights."
President Andrew Jackson chose not to enforce the court's decision. He said at the time: "The decision of the Supreme Court has fell stillborn, and they find that it cannot coerce Georgia to yield to its mandate." He told the Cherokee that they would need to operate under the jurisdiction of the state of Georgia or else relocate. This was a step in the direction of what became known as the "Trail of Tears," when the Cherokee were removed from Georgia and moved to territory in Oklahoma.
The answer you are looking for is option 3. Heavy taxes imposed by Aurangzeb.
Nurjahan, the father of Aurangzeb, began to build the Taj Majal that was being built for his deceased wife. This implied that he was not doing things for the people of the empire.
In the late 1600s, Emperor Aurangzeb rejected the tolerant policies of Akbar and resumed<em> the persecution of the Hindus</em> that existed before him, <em>which caused economic difficulties increased under heavy taxes and discontent sparked revolts against the Mughal rule.
</em>
These conditions favoured European merchants to take hold in the powerful Mughal Empire.
Hello, Never fear The Human Spider is here!!
Answer: Federal courts are established under the U.S. Constitution to decide disputes involving the Constitution and laws passed by Congress. The differences between federal and state courts are defined mainly by jurisdiction. Jurisdiction refers to the kinds of cases a court is authorized to hear.
Note: This is only information DO NOT copy and paste ( If you want to pass)
~
Your Hero
The Human Spider
Excelsior!
