Hi there! Hopefully this helps!
Answer: B.
Judicial restraint is the political theory that says courts shouldn't, unless absolutely required, issue rulings that broaden or alter the character of existing laws.
<h3>Justiciable constraint is exercised by whom?</h3>
A jurist (judge or justice) who upholds a philosophy of restraint can be described as one who considers democracy to have intrinsic, rather than just instrumental, value, that the judiciary is indeed the least powerful of the three branches of government, and who values stability and predictability in the lawmaking process.
<h3>Why do advocates of judicial restraint assert that judges are impervious to public sentiment?</h3>
They are freed from the strain of the outer world of public opinion since they do not have to worry about being reelected. In the end, the majority may not always be correct. The fact that the Founders established appointed judges and elected legislators is not by coincidence.
Learn more about Judicial restraint: brainly.com/question/29545866
#SPJ4
Answer:
The Johnson-Reed Immigration Act , 1924
Explanation:
The Johnson-Reed Immigration Act was passed making it harder for some Europeans to immigrate to the US, and made somewhat easier for other countries to move the US
The Immigration Act of 1924, also called as the Johnson-Reed Act, was a law of the federal that was passed on May 16, 1924 in the USA intended to limit immigration of population in the US. It, the law banned entry of the entire Chinese population and put strict restrictions to other Asian immigrant groups, and to a fewer extent, on people from Eastern and Southern Europe; but it did not apply to persons from the American continent.
The first ten amendments of the constitution, si the answer is C
Answer:
you got this dont give up
Explanation:
