Team A scored a total of 80,597 points I believe
161,161 + 33 = 161,194
161,194 ÷2 = 80,597
80,597- 33 = 80,564
80,564 + 80,597 = 161,161
For lines to be parallel, the slopes have to be the SAME.
For lines to be perpendicular, the slopes have to be the exact opposite. (opposite sign and number)
For example(perpendicular):
slope is 2
the perpendicular slope is -1/2
slope is -4/5
the perpendicular slope is 5/4
12. line a and b are perpendicular
13. Line a: y = 3/5x + 1
Line b: y = 3/5x - 2/5
Line c: y = 4/6 + 5/3x
line a and b are parallel
14. Line a: y = 3x + 6
Line b: y = 6 - 3x
Line c: y = 2/3x + 6
Neither, none of them are parallel or perpendicular
15. Line a: y = -2/3 + 4/3x
Line b: y = -1/4 - 3/4x
Line c: y = 5 + 3/4x
line a and b are perpendicular
Surprisingly, a one-step equation <em>is </em>that simple; it's just an equation that takes one step to solve. So yes, 3 + 4 = 7 would be one you could do. You could also do a simple multiplication or division problem if you'd like, for instance you could do 4*3=12, or 12/4=3. Hope I helped!
Answer:
C. Ratio
True for this case we have a clear definition of the 0 since the 0 for the heigth and the weigth represent absence of mass. And the differences between numerical values for the two variables are meaingful.
Step-by-step explanation:
We want to know which type of variable represent the weigth and the height. Let's analyze one by one the options given:
A. Ordinal
False since by definition an ordinal variable is "is a categorical variable for which the possible values are ordered". And for this case the height and the weigth are not categorical since represent quantitative data.
B. Nominal
False by definition and ordinal variable is which one that can't be represented by numeric values, and for this case the weight and the height are not example of this definition.
C. Ratio
True for this case we have a clear definition of the 0 since the 0 for the heigth and the weigth represent absence of mass. And the differences between numerical values for the two variables are meaingful.
D. Interval
False on this scale we don't have a clear definition of the 0. And for this case the heigth and the weight have a known definition of the 0 corresponding to the absence of mass. And since the ratios are meaingful for the heigth and the weigth then can't be an interval variable.
