Some of the social pros and cons of the Transatlantic Slave trade include:
Social pros:
- Intermingling of cultures.
- Exposure of cultures to other cultures.
Social cons:
- Unequal treatment of certain cultures.
- Conflict
<h3>What were some social cons and pros of the slave trade?</h3>
The Transatlantic Slave trade led to Africans being able to interact with Europeans, Native Americans, and other African tribes they didn't know existed. This then led to an intermingling of cultures in what was one of the earliest forms of globalization.
The social cons outweighed the pros however as the intermingling led to the unequal treatment of cultures. For instance, Africans were looked down upon and their cultures were labeled as witchcraft. Conflict also arose between cultures due to the superiority complex.
Find out more on the cons of Transatlantic Slave trade at brainly.com/question/9374853
#SPJ1
Answer:
I really hope this helps if not im sorry:)(:
Answer:
The similarities and the differences between two civilizations i.e., America and Africa after the collapse of ancient empires the given below.
Explanation:
<u>Similarities - Benefit from slavery:</u>
- That there had to be an even more search of cheaper enslaved people on the cultivation areas because natives must have dropped dead from illness because when the Portuguese began searching for precious metals and along the shore of western Aria, they conversely discovered slaves.
- Throughout exchange for labor, respectively European as well as Asian textiles were acquired, thereby further connecting West Africa to something like the global trade and trade channel.
<u>Difference - New labor system:</u>
- America has been subjected to different forms of labor.
- Africa was also still acquainted with Africa, and although the relationship helped the environment, it would not be a modern source of domestic labor.
The allied countries known as the big three the united kingdom, the soviet union and the united states of america. these are the 3 leading countries that controlled the allied tactics during the war against the germany. then these nations leads to the formation of the united nation
Answer:
The end of the Peloponnesian War did not bring the promised “…beginning of freedom for all of Greece.”[1] Instead, Sparta provoked a series of wars which rearranged the system of alliances which had helped them win the long war against Athens. A peace conference between Sparta and Thebes in 371 ended badly and the Spartans promptly marched upon Thebes with an army of nine thousand hoplites and one thousand cavalry. Opposing them were six thousand Theban and allied hoplites and one thousand cavalry.[2]
Over generations, the Thebans had been increasing the depth of their phalanx, generally given pride of place on the right wing of coalition armies, from the traditional eight men, to sixteen, then twenty-five and even thirty-five ranks. As the Spartan and Theban armies maneuvered toward the plain of Leuctra, the brilliant Theban general Epaminondas devised a new tactic which would use the deep phalanx to destroy the myth of Spartan superiority.
Over the generations, the citizens of Thebes had developed a reputation as tough, unyielding fighters. Epaminondas had witnessed the power of the deep Theban phalanx at previous battles, and increased the depth of the phalanx to fifty ranks, but only eighty files wide. But Epaminondas’ true innovation was to position the deep Theban column not on the right, where it would have clashed with the Spartan’s weaker allies, but on the left, where it would attack the main phalanx of the Spartan “Peers” led by King Cleombrotus, arranged only twelve ranks deep. In other words, Epaminondas was concentrating his fighting power at the critical point in the evenly-spaced, less concentrated Spartan phalanx. Finally, he arranged the Theban’s allies on his right would advance “in echelon”, each poleis’ phalanx staying slightly to the rear of that to its left, so that the allied right would protect the Theban’s flank, but not initially engage with the enemy (see Leuctra map – ‘Initial Situation’). When asked why he positioned the Theban phalanx opposite the Spartan king, Epaminondas stated he would “crush…the head of the serpent”.[3]
