Answer:
There are two reasons that the author uses to illustrate that the town would be negatively affective if the factory was to close and they are:
Source of income.
Gratitude.
Explanation:
First of all the author starts by saying that he is very thankful for being present in one of the factories that were important because of its production. Then he describes that he would give up his beliefs on tariffs if he saw the effect of the factory on people. Then he interviews different persons and the effect of the factory in their lives. Then they tell him that it is better to have a functional factory than one stopped. That they would gather in the hill it was built in case it burned to ashes, and that they would talk all day about the goods it gave them and how their lives improved after it was placed over there.
Explanation:
a. irrigation improvements
This is the correct option.
Water sources determined where people chose to settle
Explanation:
The geography of the Indus River Valley influence where people settled the same way as it did across the world in the time of the early civilizations.
The people preferred to settle on the lands where there was a steady supply of water and the land was fertile because of the flooding every season.
This is what was the basis of the farming and the situation of the trade of the time and made it so that the civilization could settle in those regions.
I would say that it is d because these I think would all be ways of being the way that they are. I’m pretty sure it is all of the above.
Have a good day! ;)
