Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
Emile Durkheim (1858-1917) was a French anthropologist, sociologist, and social scientist. According to him, social change normally takes place gradually, slowly. He observed that, when social change happens rapidly, it causes strain and breakdown. That leads to an increase in anomie, which is a sense of futility due to the sensation that social norms are weak, absent, or even conflicting.
The purpose of the IX Amendment was to claim the precept that the enumerated rights aren't exhaustive and very last and that the listing of certain rights does now no longer deny or disparage the life of different rights.
<h3>What do you know about Amendment IX?</h3>
No Title of Nobility will be granted with the aid of using the United States: And no Person preserving any Office of Profit or Trust below them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, take delivery of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any type whatever, from any King, Prince, or overseas State.
The rights included with the aid of using the Ninth Amendment aren't specified, they're mentioned as “unenumerated".
Therefore, The purpose of the IX Amendment was to claim the precept that the enumerated rights aren't exhaustive and very last and that the listing of certain rights does now no longer deny or disparage the life of different rights.
Learn more about IX Amendment here:
brainly.com/question/796033
#SPJ1
Explanation:
Numerous Christians have suffered persecutions by non-Christians and even other Christians of diverse or more or less strict beliefs during the history of Christianity.
Such persecutions have or had varying degrees of intensity, from unsecured arrest, diminishing public rights, imprisonment, flogging and torture, to execution, called martyrdom, through the payment of a supplementary tax - as the case. of the Mozarabs - the confiscation of their property or even the destruction of their property, their art, their books and their symbols or the incitement to renounce their principles and betray other Christians.
The question asks, "What is YOUR philosophy?" I can't really tell you what YOU should think ... but I can present for you the ideas of a couple different political philosophers who took opposing stands on the issue.
Thomas Hobbes and John Locke were both English philosophers who wrote during the 17th century.
Hobbes published a famous work called <em>Leviathan </em>in 1651. The title "Leviathan" comes from a biblical word for a great and mighty beast. Hobbes believed government is formed by people for the sake of their personal security and stability in society. In Hobbes view, once the people put a king (or other leader in power), then that leader needs to have supreme power (like a great and mighty beast). The people are too divided and too volatile as individuals -- everyone looking out for his own interests. So for security and stability, authority and the power of the law needs to be in the hands of a powerful ruler like a king or queen. That was Hobbes' view.
John Locke famously published <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government </em>in 1690. According to Locke's view, a government's power to govern comes from the consent of the people themselves -- those who are to be governed. This was a change from the previous ideas of "divine right monarchy" -- that a king ruled because God appointed him to be the ruler. Locke repudiated the views of divine right monarchy in his <em>First Treatise on Civil Government. </em> In his <em>Second Treatise on Civil Government, </em> Locke argued for the rights of the people to create their own governments according to their own desires and for the sake of protecting their own life, liberty, and property. Locke always favored the people remaining in charge, and asserted that the people have the power to change their government and remove government leaders if the government is not properly serving the needs and well-being of the people.
As you write your own answer to this question for your class, you will want to decide, perhaps, if you agree more with Hobbes, that security and stability are most important ... or with Locke, that the authority and liberty of the people are always paramount.
Answer:
On the first leg of their three-part journey, often called the Triangular Trade, European ships brought manufactured goods, weapons, even liquor to Africa in exchange for slaves; on the second, they transported African men, women, and children to the Americas to serve as slaves; and on the third leg, they exported to.
Explanation: African slaves were shipped to America in the system of Triangular Trade.
