Answer: Less than one year, guaranteed returns
, and a money market product
What I put for my answer think its right
Explanation:
Answer: quid pro quo sexual harassment
Explanation:
The scenario represented in the question regarding Rhonda and her company's chief financial officer is referred to as quid pro quo sexual harassment.
Quid pro quo sexual harassment is a situation that occurs when benefits, pay, employment, position, training, title, position are based on the condition that the other individual involved agree to ones sexual advances. It should be noted that this is illegal.
Answer:
$27,250
Explanation:
The computation of incremental income or loss on reworking the units is shown below:-
For computing the incremental income or loss on reworking the units first we need to follow some steps which is shown below:-
Incremental revenue per unit = Selling price after rework - Selling price as scrap
= $22.00 - $5.60
= $16.40
Total Incremental Revenue = Incremental revenue per unit × Total defective units
= $16.40 × 2,500
= $41,000
Total rework costs = Total defective units × Defects per unit
= 2,500 × $5.50
= $13,750
Now,
Incremental income or loss on reworking the units = Total Incremental Revenue - Total rework costs
= $41,000 - $13,750
= $27,250
Answer:
Abe = $17.5
Bae = $57.5
Explanation:
Abe's principle = $5,000
Bea's principle = $ 20,000
Abe individual investment yield at 0.41% = (5010-5000) = $10
Bae's individual investment yield at ) 0.50%= (20000-20050) $50
Combined investment yield at 6 % = (25,075 - (20,000+5000) = $75
Extra interest yield = (75-(50+10) = $15
The extra interest yield of $15 should be shared equally among Abe and Bae as a result of joint effort
= 15/2 - $7.5
Therefore , the $75 interest is shared as below
Abe = $10 (interest on individual principle)+$7.5 = $17.5
Bae = $50 (interest on individual principle)+$7.5 = $57.5
Answer:
b. Hire an external consultant to pick new team members for you.
Explanation:
The most appropriate option, analyzing the scenario above, would be to hire an external consultant to choose new team members for you, due to the fact that there is difficulty in choosing the qualification of the team and the volunteers who applied for the positions, so an external consultant could take this decision based on adequate parameters and less supported by biased behaviors that could favor some more volunteer by affinity or another issue that was not purely professional. In this way, a fairer, less conflicting and appropriate contracting would occur for everyone in the organization.
