<u>The story of Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde</u> is a mystery about the two friends Hyde and doctor Jekyll written by Robert Stevenson. It is a thriller and mystery drama investigated by the lawyer Utterson.
The line shows the conflict between the character vs. self.
<h3>The mystery novel can be explained as:</h3>
- The conflict is the obstruction of characters by other characters in success or development. In this excerpt, the conflict is between the lawyer and his perception about the other character Mr Hyde.
- The lawyer Utterson is a friend of doctor Jekyll and dislikes another character dear to the doctor named Mr Hyde.
- Siding with his conflict the lawyer agrees with the doctor to comply with his request and accepts the proposal with a sigh.
Therefore, it is character vs. self option c.
Learn more about The story of Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde here:
brainly.com/question/12701725
Answer:
Yes, yes it is
Explanation:
I had this for a practice question.
Answer:
The answer would be C.
Explanation:
I say the answer is C because we can clearly see that the setting of the library is being observed by the character. We get a clear description of different items in the library. (Let me know how good my answer is!)
The correct answer would be option A. "Paragraph one explains the cause of investigation and Paragraph two shows the results". This is because in the first paragraph the author is letting you know about an event that no one knew the reason for its appearance (so it is a cause for investigation) and in the second paragraph the author explains the results of the research conducted to explain said event. Option B is not correct because the first paragraph would be the problem and the second paragraph would be the solution. Option C is not correct either because the second paragraph is more than facts, it is answers. And finally, Option D is not correct because there is a clear connection between both paragraphs (since they are about the same subject).