Answer:
so,tell to the ghost open the door ok :)(
Sub-questions are narrower questions. They are important because they provide the 'skeleton' around which you will find information to answer your main research question.
Answer: D; A scientist who belongs to the Wildlife Conservation Society and runs the Manhattan Project.
Explanation:
Answer:
<u>(D) In casual conversation, people most readily admit to having a character flaw only when that admission causes them little psychological discomfort</u>.
Explanation:
An assumtion necessary to the argument is that is is possible that a person admit in front of another it's own flaws, when of course that flaw doesn't cause much discomfort in the person admiting it.
Question:
"<em>These natural laws are incontrovertible; . . . Those who resist them will be wiped out. Biology not only tells us about animals and plants, but also shows us the laws we must follow in our lives, and steels our wills to live and fight according to these laws. The meaning of all life is struggle.
</em>
<em>
</em>
<em>The excerpt above is an example of a false dilemma. Which of the following choices explains the logical fallacy in this excerpt, as well as the reason it fails to prove its point?"</em>
I think your answer would be:
- D. The excerpt contains no logical fallacies but uses true statements to persuade the audience of life’s common struggle.
