Question

In the late 1800s, after treaties and reservations failed, the United States Army went to war with American Indians in the West. In your opinion, are there any legitimate reasons for going to war? Check the reasons that you agree with. If you disagree with any of the reasons listed, leave them unchecked. to acquire new territory to try to improve the lives of people in another country to defeat a potential enemy who may be planning an attack to defend against an invading enemy

Answer 1

I’ll give you two:

Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.

No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.

Answer 2

Answer:

you can check all that apply

Explanation:

its your opinion