Answer:
-13.5
Step-by-step explanation:
-4/3w=18
You would need to get the w by itself on one side so the easiest way to do so would be to divide both sides my -4/3.
This would give you an answer of w= -27/2 or w= -13.5
Last choice the area becomes 25 times greater
Answer:
It could be to: collect data from a sample of every twentieth student who arrives at school one day
Answer:
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women
Step-by-step explanation:
The correlation coefficient between the variables h(height in inches) and pulse rates (in beats per minute) is 0.202
Sample size n=40
Level of significane alpha = 0.01
Create null and alternate hypothesis as:
H0: r=0
Ha: r not equal 0
(Two tailed test at 1% significance level)
Sample r = 0.202
r difference = 0.202
test statistic t = 
df =n-2 =38
t critical value for 0.01 and df =38 is 2.704
Since our test statistic lies below 2.704, we accept null hypothesis
There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the heights and pulse rates of women