A. is the best answer because Britain and france tried to prohibit trade with one or the other
No they weren't entitled to the sane right they had to do things they didn't want to like let the army of Great Britain stay in their homes and they had to deal with crazy taxes that were very expensive for them and they couldn't go where they want to farm or live that had to do what the king said.
Jackson--his presidency was marked by the Indian Removal Act and forced migration of the Cherokee people.
Jackson supported the right of white men to land access in the Southeast. Though the Cherokee had assimilated, owned land, and had created a democratic government they were still not white and therefore not fully accepted by the American people or society. Jackson supported Georgia's efforts to relocate the Cherokee which led to the Trail of Tears and relocation to Indian Territory now the state of Oklahoma.
When it comes to the Civil War, it is false that C. Sam Houston believed slavery to be <u>unconstitutional</u>.
<h3>Who was Sam Houston?</h3>
- He was a Senator of the United States from the South.
- He was a Slaveowner who defended slavery.
Sam Houston did not want the South to secede from the North but he also defended slavery as a tool that allowed the U.S. to be built. He therefore did not think it was unconstitutional.
In conclusion, option C is correct.
Find out more on Sam Houston at brainly.com/question/1399699.
<span>The direct cause of WWI was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand at Sarajevo on 28 June 1914. The rivalry between the Great powers is what caused WWI to break out. Also due to the Mutual Defense Alliances, imperialism, militarism, nationalism, and finally because of Archduke Franz Ferdinand.</span>
