Answer:
Just Assume that the transverse axis is horizontal
Answer:
c) at most 11.1%
Step-by-step explanation:
We have the data that is 97 ± 12, with 97 being the mean and 12 the standard deviation.
Now, the percentage of people who reached them for less than 73 dollars, if it were a normal distribution:
z = (73 - 97) / 12 = - 2
so it would be, a probability of 0.0228 or 0.228%.
But we don't know what distribution it has, but we can get an idea.
A and D discarded, as they are very high values, and 73 is well below the average.
B) is still a very high value.
Therefore the answer is C, at most 11.1%
Answer:
6 1/4
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: Choice B
There is not convincing evidence because the interval contains 0.
========================================================
Explanation:
The confidence interval is (-0.29, 0.09)
This is the same as writing -0.29 < p1-p1 < 0.09
The thing we're trying to estimate (p1-p2) is between -0.29 and 0.09
Because 0 is in this interval, it is possible that p1-p1 = 0 which leads to p1 = p2.
Therefore, it is possible that the population proportions are the same.
The question asks " is there convincing evidence of a difference in the true proportions", so the answer to this is "no, there isn't convincing evidence". We would need both endpoints of the confidence interval to either be positive together, or be negative together, for us to have convincing evidence that the population proportions are different.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
we know that
The simple interest formula is equal to
where
A is the Final Investment Value
P is the Principal amount of money to be invested
r is the rate of interest
t is Number of Time Periods
step 1
Find the rate of interest
in this problem we have
substitute in the formula above and solve for r
The rate of interest is 
step 2
Find the sum of money that will amount to 25,500 in 5 years, at the same rate of interest
in this part we have
substitute in the formula above and solve for P
