The crowding-out effect implies that restrictive fiscal policy will reduce real interest rates.
<u>Option: D</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The crowding out effect is the circumstances where greater interest rates consequences gives output of a decline in private investment expenditure so as to dampen the initial rise in overall investment expenditure. Authorities often embraces a restrictive fiscal-policy approach and raises spending to stimulate economic activity. This contributes to interest-rate rises. Higher interest rates have a impact on private investment choices. A high magnitude of the crowding-out impact can also result in lower economic revenue.
Answer:
so savings = $2200
bonds = $4400
and mutual fund = $3400
Explanation:
given data
received bonus = $10,000
savings account paying = 4.5% per year
bonds paying = 5%
mutual fund that returned = 4%
income from these investments = $455
to find out
How much did the worker place in the government bonds
solution
we consider amount invested for 4.5 % is = x
and hen his investment in bonds is = 2x for 5%
and rest is 10000- x - 2x
that is = (10000- 3x ) for 4%
so
interest equation will be here
0.045 x + 0.05 (2x) + 0.04 (10000-3x) = 455
solve we get
x = 2200
so savings = $2200
bonds = $4400
and mutual fund = $3400
Answer:
As a risk minimizer : Stock A has the lowest standard deviation, thus, it should be chosen, if it is to be held in isolation . Also stock B has the lowest beta, thus,it should be chosen, if it is to be held as part of a well - diversified portfolio.
The answer is A and B respectively
Explanation:
The standalone risk or standard deviation of the stocks is alleviated for a well diversified investor . So, in that case, the relevant risk would be the market risk or the beta.
When you see in isolation, relevant risk would be the standard deviation.
Therefore, as a risk minimizer : Stock A has the lowest standard deviation, thus, it should be chosen, if it is to be held in isolation . Also stock B has the lowest beta, thus,it should be chosen, if it is to be held as part of a well - diversified portfolio.
Explanation:
1) Famous celebrities and the people with lots of money are often seen with workers round them for their household chores/tasks. Although they are paying money for the work they could have done by themselves but if we analyze closely, they are actually taking advantage of the opportunity cost. The time when they were suppose to do the household work, now they are performing other task in that time which will be giving them much greater economic benefit, taking advantage of the concept of opportunity cost. For example, Cristiano Ronaldo can focus on his workout and daily exercise instead of making daily meals for himself, so he should have hired someone to do the meal work for him while he perform his workout which will help him on the field and will earn him much money.
2) Yes, it is possible for 2 countries to benefit from trade as a whole because they can get into an agreement by allowing free trade between the countries, for example, both the countries could agree that all the trade which will be executed between them would be tax free and no duties will be paid on them. This way the trade numbers would increase and industrialization would take place to meet the export/import orders. On the contrary, trading individually can be not so beneficial because there will be no free trade agreements between individuals i.e. no free lunches, that is why it could cost individuals much more than they can make money out of it.
3) One of the main reasons to oppose policies that restrict trade among the nations is that GDP. GDP is a measure of growth in any country, therefore when there will be no trade among countries, it would result in less productions of goods and services which which lead to less industrialization, which then will result to low employment and more unemployment, ultimately resulting in very low growth for any country and since growth is the only way forward for any nation, economists oppose policies that restrict trade among countries/nations.
I hope this detailed answer of mine help the poster.
Thank You and Good Luck.
<span>Henry Company should record the rent expense on August 2. Although the check was prepared on July 25 and mailed on July 27, it should not be recorded until the check is actually cashed.</span>
