Using remainder theorem, we get:

Substitute t = 5 into the equation:


Thus, we get a remainder of 93 or (A)
The best answer from the options that proves that the residual plot shows that the line of best fit is appropriate for the data is: ( Statement 1 ) Yes, because the points have no clear pattern
X Given Predicted Residual value
1 3.5 4.06 -0.56
2 2.3 2.09 0.21
3 1.1 0.12 0.98
4 2.2 -1.85 4.05
5 -4.1 -3.82 -0.28
The residual value is calculated as follows using this formula: ( Given - predicted )
1) ( 3.5 - 4.06 ) = -0.56
2) ( 2.3 - 2.09 ) = 0.21
3) ( 1.1 - 0.12 ) = 0.98
4) (2.2 - (-1.85) = 4.05
5) ( -4.1 - (-3.82) = -0.28
Residual values are the difference between the given values and the predicted values in a given data set and the residual plot is used to represent these values .
attached below is the residual plot of the data set
hence we can conclude from the residual plot attached below that the line of best fit is appropriate for the data because the points have no clear pattern ( i.e. scattered )
learn more about residual plots : brainly.com/question/16821224
Answer:
120
Step-by-step explanation:
the answer yOU are looking for would be 120
Answer:
4.8 inches
Step-by-step explanation:
<em>See comment for complete question</em>
Represent the larger triangle with 1 and the smaller with 2.
So, we have:
-- height of 1
Required
Determine H2 --- Height of 2
To do this we apply dilation formula.

In this case:

Substitute 6 for H1 and 0.8 for Scale Factor


Hence, the height of the smaller triangle is 4.8 inches