1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alexgriva [62]
3 years ago
6

Interaction among members of collectivities is direct and long-lasting. True or false

History
2 answers:
Andreas93 [3]3 years ago
6 0

The answer is False :DD


Gala2k [10]3 years ago
5 0

The correct option in this particular case is: false.

Explanation

The interaction among members of collectivities, who are individuals considered as a whole group, isn't direct and long-lasting.

I hope this is the answer that you were looking for.

You might be interested in
The answer is a they had a difficult life sorry if I’m late
Alisiya [41]

Answer:

i don't understand your question all so if your late start earlier!

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What did the Force Bill authorize President Jackson to do? Check all of the boxes that apply.
USPshnik [31]

Answer:

B

C

Explanation:

The Executive Branch (President and Vice President) controls the military, and the executive branch has the authority to collect all votes if necessary, primarily to inspect any suspicious activities going on.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of these is considered a concurrent power
Y_Kistochka [10]

Collecting taxes. Is the answer.

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The US acquired the Panama Canal zone by helping Panama become independent from Colombia. This was an example of –
Yanka [14]

Explanation:

compromise bills of 1820

7 0
3 years ago
Why did the Supreme Court deem it important to uphold faithless elector laws? What might the consequences be if electors were al
ziro4ka [17]

Answer:

Legally, representatives of the Electoral College have the right to vote as they like and for whom they want, ignoring the results of popular vote in their states. State governments, for their part, have the power to impose monetary fines and, in some states, to revoke such votes. The general situation was clarified by the Supreme Court in 1954 in the ruling in Ray v. Blair. It was clarified that the states and parties to which the electors belong have the right to demand from them a preliminary “pledge to vote” and provide for actions in case of violation of such an oath, but they cannot prosecute electors in the framework of criminal procedure of the Code for breaking such an oath.

Now, the Supreme Court places emphasis on the protection of the popular will, which gives voters the task of voting for the required candidates. If this were not the case and the voters chose with absolute freedom which candidate to vote for, the popular will would be severely impaired and the voters would be practically the only voters who would define the destiny of the federal government.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help!!! Thank u!
    6·2 answers
  • 3.What are the two variables needed to calculate demand?
    7·1 answer
  • Why were some Federalists opposed to the Louisiana Purchase?
    10·2 answers
  • Describe the forces that tended to unify americans in the early 1800's as well as some of the important points of disagreement
    12·2 answers
  • Please help asapp please
    14·1 answer
  • How was land farmed in the tide water region and in the virgina backcountry
    15·1 answer
  • Can you help me please
    11·1 answer
  • SOMEONE HELP ME PLS I NEED TO EXPLAIN THIS IN MY OWN WORDS
    15·1 answer
  • ASAP!!!
    10·1 answer
  • here are some free point for all you people out there that atually helpes others instead of sending a link i appreciate it
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!