Answer:
D is the answer
Explanation:
I hope this helps, and thanks! I think this is the answer, but I may be wrong. BRAINLIEST PLEASE!
Organizations can pay individuals to write nice comments about them on social media (which is unethical) or they can focus on the person who has complained to the business however, the focus should be on solving the problem.
<h3>What are social media complaints?</h3>
Because of their wide reach and ability to quickly escalate complaint information, social media platforms are particularly useful as a complaint route. As a result, social media complaints have a significant influence on other consumers' attitudes and behavior, as well as business image and brand value.
When it comes to social media complaints, the majority fall into the latter two categories, with the top reason being to raise awareness among other customers, and the second reason is that a user is looking for an apology or remedy.
To determine whether something is a complaint, consider whether the individual is unsatisfied. Do they necessitate a response? If a complaint is submitted verbally, the 2009 Regulations require that a written record of the complaint be created and communicated with the complainant.
Learn more about social media:
brainly.com/question/29036499
#SPJ1
Answer:
The Cauvery
Explanation:
The Cauvery is also known as Ganga of the south or Dakshin Ganga.
Preponderance of evidence is the burden of proof lies on the plaintiff/the person suing in the case.
<h3 /><h3>
What is preponderance of evidence?</h3>
This type of evidence is used in civil cases where the burden of proof lies on the person who sues, i.e. the plaintiff. The evidence must be credible and convincing as compared to other party of the case.
So in the above statement when a man sues a corporation regrading unsafe business practices he has the burden of proof under preponderance of evidence.
Therefore, option b aptly describes the burden of proof.
Learn more about preponderance of evidence here:
brainly.com/question/15023647
<span>Some opportunity costs of a greater government role in the economy are government agencies ruining competition and creating a need for higher prices.</span>
