Answer: A. Medicare
Example - the anwser is A my human friend
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
What the officers did was unconstitutional and violated the 4th amendment. Weeks v. United States established the Exclusionary Rule in 1914. At the time the exclusionary rule was only applied for federal courts instead of all courts. In 1949, Wolf v. Colorado, the High Court ruled that the Exclusionary Rule did not apply to the State but the Fourth Amendment did. In 1961, Mapp v. Ohio, the High Court ruled that the exclusionary rule applies to the state level as well as the federal. Justice Clark said this perfectly, "Thus the State, by admitting evidence unlawfully seized, serves to encourage disobedience to the Federal Constitution which it is bound to uphold....... Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws, or worse, its disregard of the charter of its own existence."
The mechanics liens is going to be the most likely remedy that the contractors would seek for.
<h3>What is the mechanic's lien?</h3>
This is a legal statement that is made against a property. The lien is usually used by the subcontractors due to the fact that they have worked on a property and have not received payment for the job.
It is a way of seeking payment for the job they have done in this housing project.
Read more on mechanic lien here brainly.com/question/26368971
Answer:
The answer is B! Hope this helps
