Answer: deceptive pricing
Explanation:
Overall, the answer could be deduced from the defenitions of those terms.
We can surely exclude green washing, which basically means that the product is sold under "eco", "green" label, when it is not. Puffery is a legal practise, which can not be proven to be true or false; which is clearly not the case in this example.
Now we are left with three categories of deceptive marketing practices. Deceptive packaging means that the product does not fit the image peceived from its package. This might be the design, the size, the picture of the product, etc. Deceptive promotion means that the information on the ads is inaccurate, partly withhold, or false. Deceptive pricing means that the seller offers the product at lower price. This can be done by promoting low price for low-in-stock or out-of stock items and then offering the substituent products of the same category, which are surely more expensive.
Answer:
<u>$35</u>
<u>Explanation</u>:
Note the formula:
Total revenue (TR)= Price (P) x Q and Marginal revenue (MR) = Change in TR / Change in Q
<u>Total Revenue for 2 units of output sold</u>
= 2 x $50 = $100
<u>Total Revenue for 3 units of output sold</u>
= 3 x $45 = $135
<u>The Marginal Revenue=</u>
Change in TR (135-100) / Change in quantity (3-2)
= $35/1
= <u>$35</u>
Therefore, the Marginal Revenue If the firm sells 3 units of output, will be $35.
Answer:
The answer is option A To effectively track the Sprint progress, Scrum mandates Preparing Sprint burn down charts
Explanation:
Sprints are time-boxed periods of one week to one month, during which a product owner, scrum master, and scrum team work to complete a specific product addition. During a sprint, work is done to create new features based on the user stories and backlog. A new sprint starts immediately after the current sprint ends.
Some scrum teams deploy new product features for use at the end of each sprint. For scrum teams with a release with every sprint, the time to market is simply the sprint length, measured in days.
A sprint burn down chart shows the progress the development team is making and is a powerful tool for visualizing progress and the work remaining.
Answer:
One possible revision suggestion for the previous follow-up letter is to:
c. Identify the position he applied for and the date of the interview.
Explanation:
Stating clearly the position that Enrique interviewed for and the the date of the interview will enable the interviewer to reconsider the candidacy of Enrique for the copy-editor position. However, the wording of his first draft of the follow-up email sounds too condescending. Enrique should not display some desperation in his job-search effort.