Answer:
The explanation of the three factors and they conclusion are below.
Explanation:
To begin with, when we talk about experimental units we refer to the entities that the researcher looks forward to make inferences about, so that means that in this case the experimental units of the situation will be all the people who got to visit the website in both schedules, the morning shift and the afternoon shift.
Secondly, the treatments is understood to be the process or the way, it could be said, that the researchers administrate to the experimental units. So that implicates that in this case the treatments will be the morning with its comfort described and the afternoon on the other side with its discounted prices shown.
Finally, the most probable outcomes for this experiments will be that the statics will show how the people interact with the variables and which of them generated more interest, that being either price or comfort. It will also show the behavior of the people when it comes to understand if the tend more to visit the web site at morning or afternoon.
Coca Cola follows a price discrimination strategy in its marketing mix and the target market is younger customers within the age bracket of 10-25.
<h3>What is Marketing mix?</h3>
These are set of marketing tools that the firm uses to pursue its marketing objectives in the target market.
Coca Cola follows a price discrimination strategy in its marketing mix means that they charge different prices for their products and its target market are young customers.
Read more about Marketing mix here brainly.com/question/859394
Answer: 0.89
Explanation: add the 82% and 47% then subtract the 40, answer is 89.
Answer:
Positive Statements: 1st & 2nd ; Normative Statements: 3rd & 4th
Explanation:
Positive Economics is <u>objective</u> & <u>facts</u> based <u>actual</u> economic issue description , explaining verifiable phenomenas (causal relationships).
Normative Economics is <u>subjective</u> & opinion based conclusive <u>solutions</u> to economic issues, including '<u>ought to be</u>' unverifiable suggestions.
1. Lung cancer kills millions of people each year: reflects actual objective verifiable fact about an economic (health) issue.
2. Too many people smoke: denotes another actual objective variable fact connected to (potential cause of) the above economic (health) issue.
So , these two are Positive Statements.
3. If the government were to increase taxes on cigarettes, fewer people would smoke : Is subjective opinion based probable solution to the above economic (health) issue.
4. The government should increase taxes on cigarettes : Is an 'ought to' suggestion for an economic participant (govt) to solve the above economic (health) issue.
So , these two are Normative Statements
I guess the correct answer is the system administrator for the system in question.
The best source for technical information needed in a network investigation is the system administrator for the system in question.
