The subject of the independent clause in the sentence we are analyzing here is "The only people", and the verb is "were", as further explained below.
<h3>What is an independent clause?</h3>
An independent clause is a group of words that has a subject and a predicate. It conveys a full thought, which means it can be completely understood, without the need for other clauses.
The sentence we are analyzing here contains one independent clause and two subordinate clauses. The problem is that one of those subordinate clauses is placed between the subject and the verb of the independent clause, which makes it a bit confusing:
- Independent clause: The only people were a few Tarrageishan cannibals.
- First subordinate clause: who witnessed Duncan's misadventure.
- Second subordinate clause: who happened to be passing by.
Now that we know which one is the independent clause, we can easily identify its subject and verb:
- Subject - The only people.
With the information above in mind, we can conclude that the answer provided above is correct.
Learn more about independent clauses here:
brainly.com/question/25322033
#SPJ1
Answer:
to hear something someone has said
Explanation:
lolz
Hello. As you did not provide the text to which the question refers, the textual evidence may be inaccurate.
Answer:
Cal and Pop live like hoboes because of the great depression.
Explanation:
Cal and Pop had a farm they worked for and had rural work as their only occupation. However, during the great depression the farm was lost and Carl and Pop had nowhere else to go or what to do and so they decided to wander the trail for years, living like real hoboes, without a home, without a job, without food and without occupations.
I think C, character vs society
Answer:
This is FALSE.
Explanation:
Each piece of writing does have a title or sub-title. But, it is not correct to infer the context of the piece based purely on the title. Because the whole text would provide more detailed information on the given heading. It would elaborate different or related aspects of the given title.
So, to properly understand the whole writing, it is not correct to conclude the meaning of the writing depending solely on what the title is.
