Option A. If a historian takes a source out of context, she is likely to:
A. misunderstand the intended meaning of historical actions.
<h3>What does it mean to take things out of context?</h3>
This is used to refer to the fact that a person is taking what is being said outside of the meaning that the message is supposed to convey. It has to do with not being able to understand what is said and interpreting it accordingly.
In this situation, when the historian takes things out of their context, then it means that they would not understand the true meaning of the happenings of that period.
Read more on historical events here: brainly.com/question/17040564
#SPJ1
The Illinois State Farmers' Association would most likely be allied with the:
d. Grangers
The freedom of african americans where socially limited as they where refrained from communicating to family they had in africa and from speaking back to there owners. Freedom for African americans was limited politically as they had no right to vote or speak up about what or who they thought should have been president. F<span>reedom for African americans was limited economically as they where only </span>allowed to do what told when it came to farming or living as most have to outside or do what ever they had to outside.
The main way in which lawmaking at Jamestown differed from lawmaking at Plymouth was that lawmaking in the former was based primarily on crop cultivated and survival, whereas many of the laws passed in the latter revolved around God, since they were a highly religious colony. <span />
Over the last 20-25 years there has been many terist attacks around the around the world like 9/11 the bombing of Pearl Harbor and many more but now we have not seen or heard of any terist but they did catch some so in my opinion it reduced.
