1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]
3 years ago
5

Who Sank the Lusitania and how that changed the course of the war.​

History
2 answers:
olga2289 [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:A German U-boat torpedoed the British-owned steamship Lusitania, killing 1,195 people including 128 Americans, on May 7, 1915. The disaster set off a chain of events that led to the U.S. entering World War I.

Explanation:

mr_godi [17]3 years ago
5 0

Schwieger was to blame for sinking the Lusitania. It changed the course of the war because it hindered or severed relationships between Germany and the U.S

You might be interested in
The _____ begins at the base of your skull and consist of the first 7 vertebrae in your spinal column?
DENIUS [597]
Spinal cord im not sure though
6 0
3 years ago
Which democratic principle of the US system of government is the house of representatives in?
NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:Under the separation of powers, each branch of government has a unique function. The legislative branch makes the laws and has the power to pass, change, and repeal laws. Article I of the Constitution establishes the legislative branch (the House of Representatives and the Senate).

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
When a government imposes a fine to coerce citizens to follow a law, which technique of enacting domestic policy is it employing
loris [4]
Authoritative


Hope I Helped You!!! :-)

<span>Have A Good Day!!!</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did religious issues contributed to political unrest in England in the 17th century.
Maurinko [17]
The 17th century was a time of great political and social turmoil in England, marked by civil war and regicide. Matthew White introduces the key events of this period, from the coronation of Charles I to the Glorious Revolution more than 60 years later.
The 17th century was a period of huge political and social upheaval. From an age characterised by the Crown’s tight control of the state, the century witnessed years of war, terror and bloodshed that enveloped the kingdom, as well as the execution of Charles I and the introduction of a republic. Yet all this was again to be overthrown with the restoration of Charles II: a short-lived return to autocratic royal influence finally swept away with the installation of William and Mary as ruling monarchs.

Charles I and notions of absolutism

The origins of the English Civil Wars are firmly rooted in the actions of one man: King Charles I. As a child, Charles was never destined to succeed to the throne. The weak and sickly second son of James I, Charles had lived in the shadow of his elder brother Henry, who was educated in the ways of kingship by his father. All this changed when, in 1612, Henry contracted smallpox and died, suddenly placing Charles as heir to the throne, eventually to be crowned in his own right in 1625. The old king, James I, had been schooled in notions of compromise, forced to negotiate with his nobles on matters of religion and affairs of state. Charles, by contrast, adopted a starkly different approach, believing that his authority alone was supreme and ordained by God: defined by the principle of the ‘Divine Right of Kings’. ‘It is for me to decide how our nation is to be governed’ he wrote; ‘I alone must answer to God for our exercise of the authority he has invested in me’.[1]

Charles I’s absolutism manifested itself at a time of emerging self-confidence among the English elite. Though Parliament met only sporadically during this period – and acted mainly in an advisory role to the sovereign – by the time Charles was crowned he was already highly dependent on the gentry’s ability to raise adequate tax revenues (derived from agricultural rents, which far exceeded any other sources of income). It was this body of landowning gentlemen that constituted the bulk of Members of Parliament, men who, in theory, could by withholding his sources of income, hold the king to account. Conflict between Crown and Parliament arose for a number of reasons. In matters of religion Charles appeared to disregard the Protestant settlement secured by Henry VIII, favouring instead the Catholic mass and, in 1625, marrying a Catholic member of the French nobility, Henrietta Maria. Charles also continued to act unilaterally in matters of foreign policy and, in the face of criticism levelled by his chief advisers, dissolved Parliament in 1629. Parliament would not meet again for another 11 years.

Without Parliament to sanction his financial needs, Charles found himself in increasingly difficult circumstances. Rebellion in Scotland (provoked by Charles’s insensitive imposition of a new prayer book) required that additional revenues be raised in order to finance a military response. Reluctantly, the king convened a new Parliament in 1640.

The new Parliament that met that year was at once openly hostile to the Crown. MPs complained bitterly about the imposition of taxes and the blatant disregard of religious toleration in the north. (The Scots had rejected Charles’s prayer book and drafted a National Covenant in defiance of the king, resisting his religious reforms in favour of a simpler form of Protestant worship.) Sensing weakness in Charles’s position, key concessions were demanded from the king, and personal attacks were launched against his key ministers. Among them, Thomas Wentworth, Earl of Strafford, was to suffer the death penalty for what Parliament labelled acts of treason against the Scottish nation. A botched attempt to arrest five MPs for treason set the king directly in conflict with his people. The scene was set for civil war.

A nation at war

Fearing for his own safety, in 1642 Charles fled London, first heading north to where he believed his main support lay. At Hull, the king was refused entry to the city by the Lord Mayor, and later that year, in Nottingham, Charles raised his royal standard: the first symbol of open warfare with Parliament.

On 23 October 1642 the first true battle of the Civil Wars took place, at Edgehill in Warwickshire, resulting in stalemate between Parliamentarian and Royalist forces. For four years afterwards skirmishing and warfare erupted across the nation, as Roundheads (labelled for the Parliamentarians’ short cropped hair) and Cavaliers (a derogatory term describing the courtly dress of Royalists) pitched themselves against each other.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In what year was Abraham Lincoln elected president?<br> A. 1848<br> B. 1850<br> C. 1854<br> D. 1860
horsena [70]
He was elected in D. 1860. 
Hope that helped you.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Realistically, you will need to borrow money at some point in your life. What is the first item you are considering borrowing mo
    15·1 answer
  • George Washington's Farewell Address, 1796
    10·1 answer
  • Which country did NOT control a piece of Germany after World War II?
    13·2 answers
  • V-E Day just happened to be President Truman's _____.
    10·1 answer
  • Who is the leader of North Korea?<br> Kim Jong-un<br> Hamid Karzal<br> Kim Jong-il<br> Xi Jinping
    10·2 answers
  • 1. What is a special interest group?
    8·1 answer
  • Que experimentaron los pueblos europeos por pertenecer a una pntencia imperialesta??​
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following was an improvement in African American life during the reconstruction?
    5·2 answers
  • What has Britain done in the Declaration of Independence
    14·2 answers
  • Question 2 of 10
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!