Answer:
The name "India" is originally derived from the name of the river Sindhu (Indus River) and has been in use in Greek since Herodotus (4th century BCE). The term appeared in Old English as early the 9th century and reemerged in Modern English in the 17th century.
Explanation:
The best option is option. C
<u>IRRIGATION</u>
- The agricultural practise of applying measured amounts of water to land to help in crop production, as well as to develop landscape plants and lawns, where it may be referred as watering, is known as irrigation.
- Rain-fed agriculture is defined as agriculture that does not utilise irrigation and relies only on direct rainfall.
<h3><u>What makes irrigation crucial?</u></h3>
- Two crucial agricultural needs are met by irrigation in dry regions of the world:
- (1) a moisture supply for plant development that also carries vital nutrients; and
- (2) a flow of water to leach or dilute salts in the soil.
To Learn more about Irrigation, Click the Links.
brainly.com/question/22708021
#SPJ4
<u>Cyber-crime - white collar crime - robbery</u>
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
- Cyber crime is the crime most happening at the global level as well as regional level. This crime is fastest growing crime and has an impact on a large population.
- Cyber crime is the crime related to the cyberspace or in simple terms the internet which is used by almost everyone uses in this day and age.
- White collar crimes refers to crimes that are committed by people in regular course of business like extortion, bribery etc.
- Robbery means to rob someone of precious possessions and is the crime which has the lowest value.
I think the correct answers from the choices listed above are option B and D. The actions that motivated radical Republicans to seek the impeachment of President Johnson would be that President Johnson helped write the new state constitutions and <span>fired several military commanders who supported radical reconstruction.</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Argue a case for appointing judges and then argue a case for having them elected.
In the case of appointing judges, many experts agree on the idea that appointed is better because judges have to be neutral. They serve the Constitution, they do not serve any political party or particular interests.
Once appointed, the judges are going to ratify, so it is supposed that their integrity is double-checked.
In other cases, some arguments favor the election of judges, stating that people should be trusted to elect judges. Through this election, judges will be driven to serve the people who put their trust in them to impart justice.
If they are elected, some voices agree that judges should be elected for a determined period, so people could evaluate if they did a good during their tenure.
However, in both cases, some advantages and disadvantages have to be resolved by law experts and politicians in their respective states.
