Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they brought 'an expert'.
To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.
Answer:
There would be a decrease in contractility
Explanation:
Since the calcium ion channel blockers slow down the calcium ion and they do not affect the potassium ion efflux which thus leads to a quick repolarization of the cell. This causes the muscle cell to lose the ability to sustain the excitability needed to keep it in a contracted state.
Examine una fuente: léala atenta y críticamente. Organice sus pensamientos: descubra la afirmación y la evidencia principales, investigue los recursos secundarios. Enuncie una tesis: asegúrese de que tenga tanto una afirmación como los detalles que la sustentan. Escribe un esquema. Escribe un borrador de tu ensayo crítico. Edita y mejora tu ensayo.
Answer: A
Explanation:
The answer is A: the purpose of the colonies was to economically benifit the mother country.
