Answer:
challenge for cause is the answer.
Explanation:
Although the material is banned, I will keep the person in abeyance unless there is any proof against his allegations. Even if nothing is confirmed, picking such a person who is a compulsive liar would be in my own choice. I can not endanger my company and its workers by recruiting an employee who may be off - the-record suspect, if the offense is not confirmed. I comprehend that it is not legitimate to act on the prohibited information, but an act of a non-social nature is equally a ban on society, and I, as a recruiter, can not promote the same thing.
Answer:
A. & B. Both
both be a perfect answer for this blank questions
As he committed crimes that can be tried in State court, the last Texas Court to hear John's case is the <u>Texas Supreme Court. </u>
<h3>Which court is John's final court?</h3>
In every state there exists a judicial system that is similar to the federal system because there is a Supreme Court.
The state Supreme Court is the highest judicial court in a state which means that the final court for John in the state of Texas is the Texas Supreme Court.
Find out more on supreme courts at brainly.com/question/2324092.
Answer:c.0.8
Explanation:
Adults with a blood alcohol content (BAC) of 0.08 or more are guilty of a DUI, but there is a “Zero Tolerance” law for drivers under 21 years old. This means that drivers who show a 0.01 BAC will face charges for drunk driving.
