1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bezzdna [24]
3 years ago
9

Difference between probable cause and reasonable suspicion

Law
1 answer:
Thepotemich [5.8K]3 years ago
4 0
  • Probable Cause: - Probable Cause is the authority which gives an Officer or someone of said power to enforce a broken law/rule.

EXAMPLE 1: Officer 1 stops Car 1 for speeding and swerving, Officer 1 gets to the vehicle and it smells heavily of alcohol and sees beer bottles in the passenger seat, Officer 1 then instructs the Driver of Car 1 to step out of the vehicle and does several DUI tests, Driver of Car 1 fails and gets arrested by Officer 1.

--- Explanation 1: Officer 1 had probable cause to arrest the driver due to drinking alcohol and failing the dui tests since Officer 1 saw bottles and smelled alcohol, this could have been avoided if Driver of Car 1 didnt drunk drive nor have sped or swerved.

  • Reasonable Suspicion:

- Reasonable Suspicion is the authority which gives an Officer of someone of said power to investigate the activity and who may be involved.

EXAMPLE 2: Dispatch calls out a BOLO [Be On the Look Out] for said person who committed a felony hit and run, vehicle is said to be a red Chevy truck. Officer 1 sees a red Chevy truck that fits the match Dispatch called out. Officer 1 calls for additional units, Officer 2 and 3 show up, and Officer 1 conducts the stop. Officer 1 and 2 approach with caution. Driver of said truck and Officers go back and forth eventually having the subject out of the truck and questioning. Officer 1 says "We have reason to believe you were involved in a felony hit and run." - Truck owner complies and all Officers find out the subject they stopped if NOT the person they are looking for.

--- Explanation 2: Officer 1 thinks the truck is a perfect match of what Dispatch called out, Officer 1 asks for more units causing Officer 2 and 3 to arrive, they investigate the situation later finding out the person they stopped was not the person they were looking for, but stopped that truck anyways because they have REASON TO BELIEVE (Reasonable Suspicion) that they were involved in the felony crime that occurred minutes ago.

You might be interested in
Officer Crosby just returned to his desk. He has to complete paperwork on the arrests he has made for the day. In which patrol a
spin [16.1K]

The patrol activity  he is  participating is Administrative duties  

Administrative duties  is the way in which a person carryout his or her  day to day job duties or assignment such as:

•Sending mails

•Receiving phone calls

•Preparing reports

•Preparing  memo

•Ensuring that files are well organized etc.

Adminstrative skills include:

•Comunication skill

•Listening skill

•Ability to Multitask

• Organization skill etc

Performing or Carrying out Administrative duties enables day to day smooth running of company or organization operation.

Inconclusion The patrol activity  he is  participating is Administrative duties .

Learn more about Adminstrative duties here:

brainly.com/question/7512252

7 0
2 years ago
Why do we call earth a blue planet?
Elena L [17]

Answer:

because it of the water

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Witnesses, suspects and victims should be processed and interviewed _____________.
zubka84 [21]
Answer: C

Makes the most sense
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The minimum wage is an example of a federal law that supports.
coldgirl [10]
The minimum wage is an example of a federal law that supports: Economic equity. The government's role in a mixed economy is that it is the: Regulator charged with preserving
7 0
2 years ago
What were the intended and unintended Consequences of the first step act?
strojnjashka [21]

Answer:

Prof. Berman noted that First Step Act Sec. 403, “described as a ‘clarification of Section 924(c),’ eliminates the required “stacking” of 25-year mandatory minimums for multiple 924(c) counts at the same time… Sadly, Congress did not make Section 403 of the First Step Act retroactive, and thus defendants previously subject to these extreme stacked sentences will get no direct relief from the new Act.”

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • People who traveled to Fort Union often had to take a train before traveling on the Santa Fe Trail. Describe two of the conditio
    10·1 answer
  • 13. On a two-week vacation in a neighboring state,
    9·1 answer
  • Help that would be great
    11·2 answers
  • Rawls might criticize Locke’s social contract on which of the following grounds?
    7·1 answer
  • Abdel fields vs United States explained
    8·1 answer
  • Did the company pay at the end of the rainmaker
    7·1 answer
  • Describe en que hechos de Nuestra Realidad Nacional Percibes Políticas económicas neoliberales?
    7·1 answer
  • 1. Under the Obama Administration, what did the Justice Department allow states to do in regards to marijuana?
    15·1 answer
  • write a paragraph on your opinion of the correctional system. Do you feel it should be altered or changed?​
    10·2 answers
  • Which was a result of the interaction between European Settlers and Native Americans?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!