The following is missing for the question to be complete: <em>What is the opportunity cost of eating the home-cooked meal?</em>
Answer: The value of the ingredients that go into the home-cooked meal and the value of a five-dollar dinner at Burger Joint
Explanation: Opportunity cost is a value that is lost when a particular choice is made, and in doing so, a certain value of money is lost due to the non-choice of another alternative, thereby losing the benefit of the alternative choice. This means that if we have a $ 5 coupon to dine at Burger Joint but don't do it, we're having dinner with the ingredients we have to make a home-cooked meal, we also lose the money needed for home-cooked ingredients and lose the coupon for Burger Joint because it expires today. So the total cost, i.e opportunity cost, is both the value of the Burger Joint coupon and the value of the ingredients for home-made meal, because if we had chosen the alternative of having dinner at Burger Joint, the coupon would not have failed due to expiration today, we would have used it, and not spent money for home-made ingredients.
Answer:
Jewish law is an example of theocratic law system.
Explanation:
A theocratic law system is a legal system essentially built upon religious teachings, of which Jewish law is an example. However, Islamic law is, currently, the most widely practiced theocratic system. Totalitarian States based on theocratic legal systems often limit the expression of other religious beliefs among their populations.
Answer:
Explanation:
With regard with your question, most democratic governments consider participating in national elections a right of citizenship. Some consider that participation at elections is also a citizen's civic responsibility. In some countries, where voting is considered a duty, voting at elections has been made compulsory and has been regulated in the national constitutions and electoral laws.
Disclosure versus anonymity is a critical issue that can be described as expecting group participants to make the choice to relinquish some of their controlled and rehearsed ways and allow themselves to respond more spontaneously to events of the moment.
Anonymity According to Marx (1999), anonymity represents a state in which a person cannot be identified. It is social in nature and requires "at least one audience" (p.100). Not surprisingly, there was much debate about its role in communication.
For example, anonymity has long been associated with personalization effects that can lead to uncontrollable behavior (Jessup, Connolly, & Garegher, 1990; Zimbardo, 1969). It is also associated with certain prosocial behaviors (Johnson & Downing, 1979; Zimbardo, 1969).
CMC is not the only means of communication that allows anonymity, but traditional forms of communication such as letters and telephones can also avoid identity verification. With computer technology, anonymity separates people in time and space.
Learn more about Disclosure versus anonymity here: brainly.com/question/1382377
#SPJ4
England,spain,portugal,the netherlands, and france
