<span>When the Afrikaner-backed National Party Came to power in South Africa in 1948, it implemented its campaign promises in the form of high apartheid. This contrasted with the segregationist policies of the pre-war government. While much of that legislation was designed to restructure the organization of economic opportunity in South Africa, apartheid legislation lacked the trademark of systematic exploitation of native Africans (Butler 19). The English speaking whites who had held power before the war were sidelined as the white constituency was consolidated under the National Party, a Afrikaner dominated political group. This allowed the National Party to enact such legislation as the Population Registration Act, which enforced classification into four racial categories: white, Co loured, Asiatic, or native. The next high apartheid landmark was the Group Areas Act of 1950. This act enforced the separate areas of residence by race across the country. It would be this act that eventually led to Promotion of Bantu Self-Government Act of 1959 that transferred Africans’ political rights to these quasi-states, which allowed the South African government to treat natives as foreigners and allow them no political representation in the South African government.</span><span />
In feudalism, there were no opportunities for economic advancement for laborers and serfs. Then the elite exploited them, so it did last long pretty long, there are other reasons, but that's one of the main reasons.
War is always caused by governments, not people, at least I believe so. The US invaded Iraq in 2003<span> because </span>Iraq<span> posed a threat to the peace of the West. The decision was controversial at the time, but the reason was clear. Saddam Hussein, the brutal dictator of </span>Iraq<span> for 35 years, was the central threat to Middle East., can u make this the brainliest plz</span>
it was a democracy your welcome
Hamlet's fourth soliloquy is probably his most famous one - "To be or not to be." It is rather different from his previous soliloquies because now he is contemplating something that didn't come up before - suicide. He is thinking whether it is worth it to fight to find his father's murderer when in the end all of them are going to die, so why not die sooner than later. He is contemplating if he should go on fighting or just kill himself and end it all, which is why this soliloquy in particular is rather depressing, hesitant, and gives a deeper insight into Hamlet's madness.
