Answer:
The answer is: social role theory.
Explanation:
Harry's beliefs and expectations about the responsibilities of men can best be explained by the social role theory. This theory, developed by psychologist Alice Eagly in the 1980s, argues that gender stereotypes are a consequence of the division of labor, which stated that men were more fit and prepared to perform jobs in the public world -in politics, army, security, etc. And confined women to the private world of the household, or in jobs related to the service and care of others -in education, nursing, cleaning, etc.
This division of labor is based in the belief that men and women have different physical and mental capacities, therefore, they can only perform the tasks and jobs asigned to their gender. According to social role theory, gender stereotypes derived from the division of labor are still present to this day, which is why Harry believes that men have the responsibility to defend their country, being braver and stronger than women.
Answer:
neutralizer , pronation.
Explanation:
Supination is an anatomical term related to the rotational motion of the foot or the forearm.
Pronation is also same as the supination but the direction of rotation of pronation is opposite to supination.
So to neutralize the supination the another muscle rotates in opposite direction means pronation to prevent the undesired motion of the bicep.
<span>The Midwest is divided by the Census Bureau into two divisions. The East North Central Division includes Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio and Wisconsin, all of which are also part of the Great Lakes region.</span>
Answer:
This phrase imposes the connotation that the government approves the creation of large wild animals in captivity.
Explanation:
Lines 10-12 expose the fact that the government allows and supervises institutions that raise wild animals in captivity, to be used in commercials, films, among other things. This refers to a connotation that the government legally allows this type of animal to be raised in captivity, which reinforces the idea that the author had given in the previous paragraph that a private property can legally raise wild and exotic animals , as long as it does not promote their discomfort.
