The answer is the first one.
In "Writers often disavow the notion of a 'literary duty'" the author conveys a somewhat condescending attitude, as if they would always follow this and set aside anyone who said otherwise. This attitude says the author is looking down on them, and that the author believes that many authors do not meet their standards.
Another answer I would consider is "...writers ruined by their shrill commitments." However, there is no context or clear tone. The author could be mournful of the lost potential for all we know.
Class versus individual characteristics: glass and tool marks versus fingerprints, hair and blood is an example of it. The items listed are things that are going to be mentioned in the chapter, which I think will present information that can help us understand criminal investigation better. We are going to learn how much Forensic files and DNA evidences are important in some criminal cases, as well as how all of the above data is collected in a crime scene.
Answer:
du u try about new alianes it so simple for discriptive writing
Unreadable
There is no reason to read the poorly written.
